Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-21-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 03-21-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 4:34:07 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 4:29:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> 160 LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT [16] <br /> sold only to families whose income is less than 50 percent of the <br /> median income of the U.S. Census Bureau's primary metropoli- <br /> tan statistical area for the region that includes Utopia, and that <br /> these units be deed-restricted with provisions requiring that they <br /> be resold only to low-income people for resale prices that are <br /> tied to rises in the consumer price index. The moderate-income <br /> units are limited to persons and families making between 80 and <br /> 50 percent of the median income and also have requirements <br /> designed to keep those units, upon resale, affordable to <br /> moderate-income persons. A unit is affordable to a given income <br /> group, according to the ordinance, if a family making an income <br /> that would put it at the top of its group could afford to rent or buy <br /> the unit by spending no more than 25 percent of its income. In <br /> the case of for-sale housing, the ordinance permits the builder to <br /> set the price based on a formula, applied at the time occupancy <br /> permits are obtained, that assumes a 10 percent down payment, <br /> and sets a price based on the maximum mortgage a home buyer <br /> at the top of the applicable group's income range can carry at <br /> prevailing interest rates without spending more than 25 percent <br /> of that family's income on interest and principal payments, esti- <br /> mated homeowner association dues, and estimated taxes. <br /> The Utopia City Council has carefully studied the housing <br /> market in the area, with the help of the professor and the city <br /> attorney, and is confident that the new ordinance satisfies all <br /> three requirements, which is necessary to avoid legal and politi- <br /> cal problems. Obviously the ordinance in question simulta- <br /> neously bestows both the higher-density benefit and the in- <br /> clusionary obligation. Although it took considerable study of the <br /> housing market, the council is also satisfied that the benefit be- <br /> stowed on the land is more valuable than the obligation extracted. <br /> In fact, the council has concluded that the owner of Fairhaven <br /> can make a lot of extra money while benefiting Utopia by con- <br /> structing 200 low- and moderate-income units. <br /> The city council has discovered that residential undeveloped <br /> land sells in Utopia for about $10,000 per permitted housing unit. <br /> Fairhaven, for instance, where only 400 market units could be <br /> built before the inclusionary ordinance was passed, can now <br /> build 800 market units plus 200 inclusionary units, with an in- <br /> crease in value from $4 million to $8 million plus or minus the <br /> cost or value of 200 inclusionary units. <br /> The city council of Utopia has done its research and knows <br /> that building 200 inclusionary units will not cost$4 million. It has <br /> been determined from a study, which the council ordered prior <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.