Orange County NC Website
6 <br /> 1 . Proposed I-85 Widening 1 Efland Interchanges <br /> Danny Rogers asked that Wilson Stroud, the DOT staff <br /> person re-evaluating the environmental impact statement (EIS) <br /> for 1-85 widening, be allowed to speak first. Stroud stated <br /> that the EIS was prepared in the early 1980's and that a <br /> finding of no significant impact (FONSI) was approved by the <br /> Federal Highway Administration in 1984 . Seven Mile Creek was <br /> not proposed as a reservoir at that time and was not <br /> addressed in the EIS. In re-evaluating the FONSI he said <br /> that while additional impervious surface would be created, <br /> pollutant runoff was not expected to be major and no <br /> significant impacts on, water quality were foreseen. He did <br /> state that control gates in roadside ditches could be <br /> considered as a protective measure in the event of a spill. <br /> Link asked when the revised EIS would be completed. <br /> Stroud said approximately two weeks . Barry Jacobs asked if <br /> there would be a comment period. Stroud indicated that a <br /> comment period was not normally provided. Link asked if DOT <br /> would be receptive to comments from the Planning Board and <br /> County Engineer and Stroud responded affirmatively. Chris <br /> Best stated that this seemed to be a case of an urban <br /> interchange in a rural area and asked how airborne <br /> contaminants were accounted for. Stroud said these were not <br /> foreseen as a major problem. <br /> Link asked Stroud if he could send the revised document <br /> to Orange County in two weeks. Stroud said he thought this <br /> could be accomplished. Link said if this schedule was <br /> adhered to the County could have a response back to DOT by <br /> the middle of December. <br /> Link then asked when construction was slated to begin on <br /> the Efland improvements. Stroud indicated that late 1990 or <br /> early 1991 was anticipated as the time for contract letting <br /> on the Efland interchanges. In discussing the proposed <br /> highway improvements, Lindsay Efland emphasized the <br /> importance of not isolating any portions of the Efland Fire <br /> Department service area referring to the proposal to close <br /> West Ten Road where it is crossed by I-85. Copies of an <br /> aerial photo showing the proposed changes were distributed <br /> and Blake Norwood assured Efland that Ben Johnson Road would <br /> be extended to US 70 to address emergency response concerns . <br /> There was additional discussion on the potential impacts from <br /> widening I-85 and Link closed by stating he thought control <br /> gates should go in regardless of the 1-85 improvements . <br /> In summing up discussion on the first topic, Link said <br /> he expected to receive the updated EIS in two weeks . The <br /> County would then have three weeks in which to review the EIS <br /> and forward comments to DOT. The County's comments would be <br /> incorporated into the document(s ) DOT would be sending to the <br /> federal government. <br />