Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
° s � � 6•11) A1 [ <br /> problem at issue with Mr. Albert and another <br /> relative and he felt he should not be penalized <br /> because of that family issue. The partial width <br /> right-of-way would only serve the Bradsher <br /> property. <br /> Mary Scearbo stated that Mr. Albert would not <br /> provide the additional 25' needed unless Mr. <br /> Bradsher would provide a 25' right-of-way all the <br /> way to the back of the property for Mr. Albert' s <br /> family member. She continued that the Planning <br /> Staff has been working with those involved and <br /> this was the solution that would satisfy all <br /> parties, yet leave an opening for a future <br /> completion of the right-of-way. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern with the county <br /> approving a partial width right-of-way to <br /> maintain one owner's control over anothers <br /> • property. He felt that the 50' right-of-way <br /> could be obtained on the property in question and <br /> there were no physical constraints to that. Mr. <br /> Bradsher responded that if he should build a <br /> house on the front lot, a 50' right-of-way would <br /> require the removal of shade trees. <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved to recommend denial of the partial <br /> width right-of-way. Seconded by Best. <br /> Scearbo noted she had discussed this issue with <br /> the adjacent property owner, Mr. Albert. He <br /> indicated that at some point he will be recording <br /> a 25' right-of-way to provide access for his <br /> family member to the back property. Scearbo <br /> continued that this could create a 50' and 25 ' <br /> adjacent to each other. <br /> Mr. Bradsher stated that he had purchased <br /> additional property to gain access to a <br /> landlocked tract and he was unwilling to provide <br /> (give away) a 50' easement to allow another <br /> property owner access to a tract that is also <br /> landlocked. <br /> VOTE: 1 in favor. <br /> 9 opposed. <br /> MOTION: Best moved to recommend approval of the partial <br /> width right-of-way as recommended by the Planning <br /> Staff. Seconded by Hamilton. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Yuhasz - felt no evidence had been <br /> submitted that physical restraints to the <br />