Orange County NC Website
PAGE 6 <br /> OWASA's responsibility to clean the water. <br /> GEORGE BRUMLEY, developer in Orange County, stated his major grievance is the issue of <br /> changing the rules in the middle of the game. They develop property and they develop <br /> according to the rules as they were written at the time they began the development. They <br /> are now faced with an impervious surface restriction that would actually change the rules <br /> during the period in which they no longer have a choice of whether to make the decision to <br /> proceed or not. If this impervious restriction is approved, he will have to change the <br /> type of development originally approved. <br /> VERLA INSKO, Chair of the OWASA Board, read a prepared statement. This statement is <br /> attached to these minutes as EXHIBIT "A" . <br /> RANDY FEW feels this is an issue of fairness and practicality. He feels the financial <br /> burden of clean drinking water should not be on those who receive no benefits from it. <br /> Those who say that a reduction of allowed impervious surface will not affect the value of <br /> land are wrong. The value of the land in Chapel Hill will rise due to the quality of <br /> life, benefits they will receive from the reduction of density surrounding the town and <br /> the increase in the quality of water. It is an unfair transfer of wealth. He stated that <br /> quality drinking water is a goal that must be achieved but he asked that the County not <br /> make those in the way of an expanding Chapel Hill and Carrboro pay the price. He asked <br /> that a way be found to spread the cost among those who will benefit from it. He feels <br /> that passing this ordinance will render many lots nonconforming. He supports Mr. <br /> Collins' proposal. <br /> PHILIP SZOSTAK spoke as a supporter of the work group that developed the watershed <br /> protection measures. What became evident during the discussion was that a stricter <br /> consistent amendment to the Land Use Plan and Development Ordinance must be put into <br /> practice. It also became clear that the CDM study was a good beginning but could not be <br /> used to scientifically justify planning restrictions. Accountability of data was the <br /> major issue of discussion. The development model was so simplified it did not take into <br /> account roadways, right-of-ways, parklands, or other undeveloped land. It did not take <br /> into account the greater reduction of possible density that would occur if septic tanks <br /> were the only method of wastewater distribution. It did not take into account the <br /> standard or required development practices such as the State's Sedimentation and Erosion <br /> Control Ordinances which require that each development allow stormwater runoff to a <br /> velocity and volume that exist prior to construction. Detention basins (BMP's) would have <br /> to be installed. All development in Chapel Hill and Carrboro must further illustrate this <br /> compliance with a computerized model as part of the final approval process. He <br /> recommended that Section II Natural Environment, subsection B on water resources, reflect <br /> two acre zoning with on-site detention ponds. Concerning Section V, Joint Land Use <br /> Operating Principles. He suggested that public water and sewer service be offered as the <br /> most reliable method of protecting our water resources. Concerning Section V, Land Use <br /> Joint Planning Areas, he recommended Option II as presented by Planning Director Marvin <br /> Collins. Concerning Section VI - Overview of the Implementation Strategies, he <br /> recommended that a study be done on public water and sewer extensions. With the EPA <br /> change in water quality guidelines, he recommended that a permanent watershed task force <br /> be establish to continuously monitor and recommend strategies to protect this water. <br /> DAVID CARR. Partner of Oak Value Properties, stated they are developing Oak Crest <br /> Subdivision and are following the rules put in place by the County Commissioners and the <br /> Planning Board. They are environmentally sensitive developers trying to work per the <br /> rules laid out. He opposed the rules changing half-way, in the game. He asked that the <br /> developers be considered in any decision made and to consider the people whose sole <br />