Agenda - 02-28-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

lots _S greater, ,t not by much. Mr. The difference for 2-acre _0 5r _ , b:.. Coll ins ' calculations indicate .n at the impervious surface for an assortment cf 2-acre lots would be approximately 70 if a Way__....._ of 12% was applied to individual lots. The 13-poi^.t agreement 11 f in - the :n the 13-point agreement is to called ar 6�G. Again ..� t..e b� _�. �..e -p g- be interpreted as an average, it is close to that computed to result from the application of a 12% maximum for individual lots . RECOMMENDATIONS A. For April 2 , 1990 1 . Consider that the basic recommendations of the :3-point agreement and the Orange County planning staff are equiv- alent in that .the 13-poin. figures refer to averages and the staff recommendations refer to individual lots . 2 . Modify the formula for the number of 2-acre lots that can be created to one that specifies the number of lots and permits averaging. For example, from a 20-acre tract , allow creation of 7 2 . 85-acre lots as an alternative to 2 5-acre lots plus 5 2-acre lots. 3. Adopt a sliding scale of average and maximum impervious surface requirements for lots smaller than 5 acres (averages only to apply to new subdivisions) . B. Beyond April 2 , 1990 1 . Commit to public acquisition of land to reduce future pollutant loading potential , 2. Provide tax incentives for "environmental easements " patterned after agricultural use-vaaue assessments . 3. Determine location of majority of 2-acre and smaller lots and use structural BY2s in subbas_ns serving existing . small lot subdivisions , e.c. , East Price ' s Creek (Heritage • Hills) and West Price 's Creek (Chatha:. County) . 4 . Proceed with review and implementation of 23-point ' agreement . Don Willhci - 3/25/90 _0326