Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-26-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 02-26-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 3:58:24 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:56:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/26/1990
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� 1 <br /> 29 -. <br /> 1 particularly in residential zoning districts which permit non-residential uses. The <br /> 2 proposed amendment to Article 5.1.2 would increase the FAR requirements in the RB, <br /> 3 AR, R-1, and R-2 zoning districts to 0.888 for individual lots and 1.000 for planned <br /> 4 developments. The FAR requirements are the same as currently required for the R-3 <br /> 5 district and are more in keeping with the actual floor area of existing facilities <br /> 6 located in rural areas. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 A motion was made by Chairman Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to refer <br /> 9 these Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br /> 10 returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than October 2nd. <br /> 1 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 2 <br /> 3 5. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS <br /> 4 a. Section IV-B-6 Reservation of Space for Utilities <br /> 5 In summary this item was presented to recaive citizen comment on the <br /> 6 proposed amendment to require dedication of water and sewer easements as a condition of <br /> 7 approval for subdivisions within 10 or 20-Year Transition Areas. The Orange County <br /> 8 Water and Sewer Policy allows extension of public water and sewer facilities to serve <br /> 9 subdivisions within 10-20 Year Transition Areas. However, use of public utilities is <br /> 0 not required. Subdivisions within Transition Areas which utilize individual wells and <br /> 1 septic tanks are not presently required to provide easements where public facilities <br /> 2 will not be utilized in the subdivision itself. This practice can create easement gaps <br /> 3 which could create difficulties for future water and sewer extensions. The proposed <br /> 4 amendment would allow for utility easements: as a requirement for subdivisions approved <br /> 6 with designated Transition Areas. -_ . <br /> 7 b. Section IV-B-10-b Cluster Development Application Criteria <br /> . In summary this item was presented to receive citizen comment on the <br /> 9 proposed amendment to the application-criteria for cluster subdivisions to include a <br /> 0 minimum tract size within the Rural Buffer Zoning District, and to exclude private road <br /> 1 right-of-way in calculating the number of lots permitted. Article IV-B-10-b(a) requires <br /> 3 a minimum tract size of 400,000 square feet in the AR (Agricultural Residential) <br /> district, and 200,000 square feet in the R-1 (Rural Residential) district. Cluster <br /> 4 developments in all other districts must contain a miminum of 80,000 square ' <br /> 5 feet. The propsed amendment. wouldrequire-400,000 square feet for cluster developments <br /> 6 <br /> in the Rural Buffer, as is required in the_ AR (Agricultural Residential) district. <br /> 7 Article- IV-B-10-b(c) excludes public road right-of-way-from the acreage calculations <br /> 8- used r � lot mted in a cluster subdivision.-.:.. It is proposed _ . <br /> 9:- __ _ . . . r____ . . _ _. <br /> -.that private road: right-of-hay b_ xluded aswell These changes are in keeping with <br /> the intent of the' application criteria set forth in Article IV-B-10-b, and would provide <br /> 1 <br /> 2- g cy..between-_the__Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations. - �. <br /> greater consisten _ _ _ - _ <br /> _ _ _ c. Section to receive <br /> 3 _ <br /> 4 In summary presented t ve citizen comment on the .. <br /> 5, proposed amendment to the public hearing regulations to require that once opened, any <br /> 6_.. - <br /> 7 public�hearing remain apes-until-a final decisions isf made_ by,-the- Board- of:-County--7--- <br /> Commissioners._ . The testimony received at:a public hearing is on record as information <br /> 8 considered by the hearing body in rendering its decision. Testimony received outside of <br /> 9 --the public hearing may not be considered: - The purpose of the proposed amendment is to <br /> 0 assure that all information received prior to the decision of the Board-of County <br /> I Commissioners can be considered.-- If approved, the amendment would deem a public hearing - ' <br /> 3 as open, from the initial hearing date until the time of the final decision. <br /> 5. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING BOARD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.