Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Identify Major Origins and Destinations <br /> 3 <br /> - Note areas currently unserved or underserved by CAT and/or Chapel <br /> Hill Transit based noon survey information. ape <br /> Evaluation of Current System and Determination of Type of Service/Service <br /> Level <br /> - Evaluate current human service agency transportation delivery. <br /> - Evaluate public transportation/Section 18 potential for county. <br /> Evaluate management alternatives, INCLUDING A <br /> A NON PROFIT AGENCY CHAPEL HILL- COY TRANSPORTATION DEPT, <br /> FIRM. SIT OR a1TSIAE FOR-PROFIT MANAGEMENT <br /> - Based on previously stated goals private sector and human service aagenciesctin s' interest he providin the <br /> service, service level determination, and concerns/p ob ems with <br /> the current method of service delivery as expressed by the <br /> steering committee, develop alternatives for <br /> transportation services and an estimate of the costrof�providing the <br /> the service (include enough detail to allow the committee to make <br /> a thorough examination of each alternative), <br /> - Evaluate feasibility of system developing into a Section 18 <br /> supported general public system. <br /> - Address incorporation of the <br /> Transportation Assistance Program (E&HTAP) into the chosen dservice ped <br /> design. <br /> Second. Steering Committee Meeting - COMPLETED BY <br /> - Review with committee transportation alternatives for their <br /> consideration. <br /> Steering Committee Response to Consultant <br /> - Within four weeks of the second steering committee meeting, both <br /> PTO and the steering Committee will respond to the consultant with <br /> comments on the written material provided at the second meeting. <br /> All parties should carefully examine the document to ensure that <br /> all agencies providing human service transportation in the service <br /> area are included in the information. (Aencies inclusion after this point will be conside ed additionalnserv7Ce.)or <br /> - Steering committee selects _alternatives . for_ consultant to detail <br /> in the final TOP.A REPORT INCLUDING THE STEERING <br /> PORTAIICN ALTERNATIVE SELECTION WIL BE CONA'9ITTEE S T$AN$w <br /> MISSIONERS FOR APPROVAL BEFORE CONSULTANT 1- My , �• �. F rj�l+ ���' - - <br /> Detail Chosen Service Design <br /> - Provide detailed information regarding service design changes from <br /> the present service delivery method based on alternative(s) <br /> selected. <br /> - Address management;/organization concerns, specifically the impact <br /> on current transportation providers such as CAT, Chapel Hill <br /> Transit, and regional transportation developments. <br /> • <br />