Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
by individual wells and septic tanks . The <br /> 15 <br /> applicant has submitted a private read <br /> justification for Roy Road, an existing private <br /> road which will give the four proposed lots <br /> access to Dairyland Road. <br /> Due to the design and location of the <br /> subdivision, the Staff determined that a private <br /> road would not be justified in this case. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> concept plan for CK Properties with a public road <br /> built to State standards. <br /> Pilkey asked the developer, Larry Carroll, his <br /> opinion of the concept plan process . Mr. <br /> Carroll responded that he felt it would address a <br /> lot of the problems at the beginning of a project <br /> with needed changes being made more easily and <br /> less expensively than later in a project. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval of the Concept Plan for CK <br /> Properties as recommended by Staff . Seconded by <br /> Pilkey. <br /> Larry Carroll, developer, asked that <br /> consideration be given to the fact that the <br /> private road is already in place and that the <br /> possibility of ever being connected to another <br /> road does not exist. There is no desire on the <br /> part of the community to have a public road with <br /> the increase in noise and traffic. The additional <br /> lots would enter the current Road Maintenance <br /> Agreement. <br /> Pilkey asked how many lots access the private <br /> road. Mr. Carroll responded that six lots could <br /> access the private road and five would have to <br /> access it. He noted that the four lots being <br /> created would all access the private road. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional <br /> conflict of interest. ) <br /> Yuhasz commented that one result he hoped to see <br /> coming out of concept plans in situations where • <br /> the Planning Staff is recommending something <br /> other than what the developer has proposed, is <br /> • <br /> more discussion of alternatives . <br /> Jacobs responded that, in the past, when private <br /> t roads have been allowed, the lot sizes were <br /> significantly larger than the required minimum <br />