Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-20-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 02-20-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 4:03:37 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S <br /> c <br /> dwelling units to screen the view of <br /> the subdivision from public roads <br /> and/or maintain a wooded or forested <br /> character; <br /> (The only mature existing trees on the site <br /> are along the right-of-way line for Dairyland <br /> Road. Existing trees will be preserved and <br /> additional trees will be planted to meet the <br /> minimum landscape requirements. No clustering <br /> of units is proposed. ) <br /> c. The maintenance of scenic views, <br /> including vistas of open farmland <br /> and/or forested hills and mountains; <br /> and/or <br /> (Not applicable. ) <br /> d. The clustering of dwelling units to <br /> preserve wildlife, botanical, <br /> historic, archaeological and/or <br /> recreation sites; <br /> (Individual lots with separate homesites are <br /> proposed. No clustering of units is <br /> proposed. ) <br /> 2 . The number, location and/or size of lots <br /> to be located in the subdivision are such <br /> that, even if constructed to State <br /> standards, the streets would not be <br /> accepted by the State for maintenance due <br /> to density or other State requirements; <br /> (When 4 lots are developed, Roy Road would <br /> meet the minimum density required by the <br /> State. Refer to first Staff evaluation <br /> comment. ) <br /> 3 . Restrictive covenants are proposed which <br /> prevent further subdivision of the <br /> property and the same shall be made a <br /> condition of approval, thus maintaining <br /> project density; <br /> (Restrictive covenants are not proposed. Under <br /> current zoning, the proposed lots could not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.