Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-20-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 02-20-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 4:03:37 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> average daily flow over the seven day driest period occurring once <br /> in a ten year period is less than twice the maximum amount of <br /> sewage discharge. <br /> One possible engineering solution to the problem with the existing <br /> point of discharge would be to redirect the treated sewage <br /> discharge so that it flows directly to Stoney Creek. Stoney Creek <br /> passes under Hwy 70, approximately 1800 feet east of Carden's <br /> Mobile Home Park. A pumping station could be installed at <br /> Carden's to pump the discharge from the new package facility to <br /> Stoney Creek via 1800 feet of 2 inch or 3 inch force main laid in <br /> the right of way (preferably in the roadway shoulder) of Hwy 70. <br /> The cost of adding the pumping station and force main would be in <br /> the $20, 000 to $30, 000 range. Arthur Mouberry, the head of the <br /> regional section of DEM, has indicated that DEM considers the flow <br /> in Stoney Creek to be insufficient for the proposed (and <br /> permitted) quantity of discharge from Carden's if the facility <br /> were presently being permitted for the first time. However, <br /> Stoney Creek is the theoretic destination of the discharge flow as <br /> the system and permit now exist (the existing NPDES permits states <br /> that the point of discharge is an "unnamed" tributary of Stoney <br /> Creek) . <br /> The position that DEM will ultimately take regarding the process <br /> of changing the point of discharge for Carden's is not clear at <br /> this time. Arthur Mouberry has indicated that DEM's present <br /> position would be that Carden's will not be forced to relocate the <br /> discharge point at this time. Carden's must, by agreement with <br /> DEM, have the package plant in operation by April 30, 1990, or DEM <br /> will begin assessing additional fines. At the time the package <br /> plant begins operating, it will be operating under a DEM "Special <br /> Order of Consent" (SOC) . The SOC will include requirements for <br /> the treatment facility to be monitored more closely than is usual <br /> for facilities not operating under an SOC. The Carden treatment <br /> facility's discharge quality requirements will have to be met if <br /> the facility is to avoid addition enforcement action by DEM. The <br /> additional enforcement action could include the loss of the <br /> discharge permit. There will be a public hearing within the <br /> process for the issuance of the SOC where the County and the <br /> neighborhood residents will have an opportunity to have input to <br /> DEM. It is possible, but not likely, that DEM will force Carden's <br /> to change its point of discharge as a result of the SOC hearing. <br /> In the event that the SOC hearing process does not cause DEM to <br /> order the change of Carden's discharge point, the next opportunity <br /> (following DEM's normal procedure for modifying or revoking the <br /> NPDES discharge permits) to change the point of discharge will be <br /> in the permit renewal process. Tim Donnelly, Arthur Mouberrry's <br /> deputy at the DEM regional office, indicated earlier this year <br /> that DEM would be willing to take a hard look at Carden's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.