Orange County NC Website
1990 PROGRAM SUMMARY <br /> 8. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Provide a summay of the program that does not exceed 200 words. Briefly <br /> describe the problem that was addressed,how it was addressed,the costs involved,and the results) <br /> NOTE:This section must follow the following former .200 words or less .75 characters or less per line <br /> -straight text:no bolded,underlined or italicized text -submit the original(not photocopied)text <br /> Unplanned and inefficient methods for providing agency <br /> transportation and funding vehicle replacement requests by <br /> Orange County lead to the establishment of the Orange County <br /> Coordinated Agency Transportation (CAT) Program. The first <br /> step in improving the coordinated and efficient use of <br /> available vehicles and, manpower was the development of a <br /> Transportation Development Plan (TDP) , which established the <br /> CAT management structure, member agency participation, the <br /> five year vehicle replacement schedule and a human service <br /> transportation advisory board. The CAT 1990 budget is <br /> $ 95 ,453 with the County contributing $ 38, 673 and the <br /> balance provided by various agencies who lease drivers and <br /> vehicles on a shared basis from the system. Tangible results <br /> have been planned agency vehicle replacements, over a five <br /> year period at a reduced cost , an increased in timesharing <br /> and ridesharing among agencies, an improved backup and <br /> emergency system, and reduced operational costs to the CAT <br /> agencies. <br /> PROBLEM/CONCERN (Describe the problem,need or concern in your county/department that prompted the <br /> development of the program. Describe the objectives of the program) <br /> Up to 1.983 local human service agencies such as the Mental <br /> Health Center, the Handicapped Sheltered Workshop, the <br /> Community . Action Agency, the Community Health Center, <br /> the Headstart Program and the County Department on Aging, <br /> were each independently purchasing, operating and maintaining <br /> their own vans and mini-buses exclusively for their clients. <br /> When vehicles needed replaced, each agency would request from <br /> County government and other sources the necessary funds. The <br /> County Commissioners became acutely aware of the unplanned <br /> and inefficient method of providing transportation and <br /> handling vehicle funding requests. At the same time, the <br /> state transportaton department was willing to provide local <br /> assistance with agency vehicle replacements (with only a 10% <br /> local match) if the County would encourage and establish <br /> a County Transportaion Development Plan (TDP) . Thus, <br /> agency transportation and vehicle replacement coordination <br /> was identified as a critical need and cost effective <br /> approach. <br /> • <br /> 2 <br />