Agenda - 02-05-1990 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6 dwellings and longer driveways were less likely to comply (see Attachment G) . 4 . Typical and square lots were more likely to comply than wide and narrow lots (see Attachments G , and T) . 5 . For all lots to comply, the minimum required lot size would have to be increased to 7 . 6 acres or the 4% impervious surface standard would have to be increased to 6 . 11% (see Attachment K) . 6 . The average required minimum lot size for all lot configurations was 5 . 05 acres while the average impervious surface ratio was 4 . 03%. 2-Acre Lots For 2-acre lots, 416 design possibilities were derived using the factors identified above. General findings are as follows: 1 . Of the total number of scenarios, 123 or 29 . 6% complied with the 6% impervious surface standard while 70 .4% did not. 2 . Lots fronting on a Class B or C private road, and having smaller dwellings and shorter driveways were more likely to comply (see Attachment Z- ) . 3 . Lots fronting on a public road, and having larger dwellings and longer driveways were less likely to comply (see Attachment L ) . 4. Typical and square lots were more likely to comply than wide and narrow lots (see Attachments M , 14, Of and P ) . 5 . For all lots to comply, the minimum required lot size would have to be increased to 4 . 0 acres or the 6% impervious surface standard would have to be increased to 11.97% (see Attachment AR) . 6 . The average required minimum lot size for all lot configurations was 2 . 35 acres while the average impervious surface ratio was 7 .0% . Relationship to Actual Building Trends To determine if the scenarios developed with the spreadsheet template were representative of real-life situations,