Orange County NC Website
I - <br /> 13 <br /> Letters To The Editor • <br /> v a real n � °Support 'Triangle mss' t o that <br /> the scope of the rail system to the point <br /> I was appalled to read your editorial of where it will not be able to attract rider- <br /> Oct 3 attacking the proposed—Triangle Fit- ship.Thus.I recommend full and unequivo- <br /> press rail system by dubbing it .an- cal support of the—Triangle Fh:press"by all <br /> other idea to pull the rug from under Due cozens and legslators who care about the <br /> ham's economic future." long-term future of the Triangle metropoll- <br /> There are absolutely no data to justify tan area. • ELLS COVEY <br /> this opinion.In fact all of the available data D <br /> lead to just the opposite conclusion.Look- <br /> ing ahead,not only at the next decade.but <br /> at the next century.Durham's economic hi- <br /> ture will depend on the development of of- <br /> fident,attrac ve and safe alternatives to <br /> automobile>ransporation. <br /> The'Triangle Depress"sounds as If it <br /> could be the first step in this direction.For <br /> every person who uses the rail system <br /> there will be one less car on the highways, <br /> one less pa.-king space used and a little less Licht rail works <br /> pollution in the air.Good public transporta- <br /> bon would greatly increase economic and Once"again our good friends at the. <br /> soda!opportunity for young,poor and state Department of Transportation <br /> hand.i cipped°ins' have plundered the truth. In what has <br /> I stroney support the proposal by Jim become a familiar and discordant re- <br /> Clark.president m Save the Water,to de- train, they tell us that the Triangle is <br /> Leigh Gary and Cho Durham,mere inappropriate for light-rail application. <br /> With disdain they point to even larger <br /> urban areas where they imply light rail <br /> has failed. A planning engineer for the <br /> state says. 'Studies done on such sys- <br /> tems in Miami, Dallas and the [San <br /> Francisco) Bay area show ridership is <br /> much less than expected.. ." <br /> But the Bay Area Rapid Transit has <br /> operated at near-saturation levels. Dal- <br /> las has yet to begin construction of its <br /> system. And, as anyone with even a <br /> cursory knowledge of light-rail activity <br /> knows, Miami utterly botched its sys- <br /> tem. Bus systems classically serve as <br /> feeders to the rail stations. Miami <br /> dismantled its entire bus system -- <br /> cannibalized it. really, in a misbegotten <br /> effort to fund the light rail. <br /> The use of these examples to influence <br /> our judgment is scandalous.At the least. <br /> it is a mark of stunning ignorance.At the <br /> worse,it is the hand of callous deception. <br /> Light rail is succeeding around the <br /> country.Buffalo and Portland are prom- <br /> inent recent success stories. It is suc- <br /> ceeding where there is foresight and <br /> clarity of thinking. A review of the <br /> literature is in order. <br /> ROSS ALLARD <br /> Cary <br />