Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-05-1990 (2)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 02-05-1990 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 12:04:19 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/5/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />• <br /> not brought us any choices,except <br /> a big bill for more highways." <br /> Sandy Ogburn, a Durham City, <br /> Council member,agreed. <br /> "Highway construction tends to <br /> be reactive. You can't build until <br /> the need is there,"she said."But <br /> this is taking a look down the road <br /> and is proactive." <br /> Continued from page IC <br /> Raleigh and Durham are exam- <br /> To attract commuters, the sys- ining proposals to build Outer <br /> tern might have communication Loops around their northern bor- <br /> cars with cellular phones and fax dcrs. The Northern Wake Ex- <br /> cars <br /> that would operate from pressway would cost 5414 million <br /> 6 a.m.to 6 p.m. during the week. to`SS433 million,while the Durham <br /> Under Mr.Clark's proposal,the Outer Loop would cost about 5350 <br /> are funded <br /> million. Both projects <br /> rail system would be funded with ts <br /> state transportation money and in a multibillion-dollar highway <br /> support from local governments, program approved this year by <br /> the General Assembly. <br /> Operating costs would come from <br /> the cities and towns it would Both the proposed roads cross <br /> serve. He gave no estimates for or are near watersheds and drink- <br /> the annual operating cost. ing water supplies, Mr. Clark <br /> Mr. Clark said the rail system said. "The highways would only <br /> could be developed in much less benefit the northern areas, which <br /> time than the proposed loops and happen to be in the most ecologi- <br /> could be in operation as soon as callysensitive areas we have,"he <br /> the early 1990s. The only new said. <br /> track that would have to be built <br /> would be between Durham and As currently proposed, the <br /> Chapel Hill. Durham loop would run near the <br /> The proposal has been sent to little River Reservoir, one of <br /> state Transportation Secretary Durham's major drinking water <br /> James E. Harrington for study. resources. It also would come <br /> But a spokesman for the Depart- close to Falls Lake, I'.aleigh's <br /> ment of Transportation said Fri- <br /> main water source. <br /> day that Mr. Harrington had not Designed to handle the area's <br /> .had an opportunity to review it. traffic needs through the year <br /> "We'll be happy to take a look at it 2010, both loop plans have been <br /> as we do with thousands of sug- criticized by neighborhood groups <br /> gestions from other citizens."said and environmentalists, while <br /> James T. Sughroe, special assis- highway planners say the roads <br /> taut for public affairs. would relieve growing traffic con- <br /> Durham County Commissioner gestion. <br /> Rebecca Heron. who attended In Raleigh,the loop has become <br /> Friday's announcement, said the a campaign issue in the race for <br /> proposal was worth studying, mayor. Raleigh City Council <br /> "For the first time,we have an member Charles C. Meeker has <br /> alternative to move people,"said questioned the need for the road, <br /> Mrs.Heron,who is also chairman while Mayor Avery C. Upchurch, <br /> of the Triangle J Council of who is seeking re-election, says <br /> Governments. "The Department the loop would ease traffic woes <br /> of Transportation certainly has for commuters in North Raleigh. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.