Orange County NC Website
8/28/89 a <br /> Public Hearing Minutes <br /> 1 d. Affordable Housing <br /> 2 (1) Article 7.14.4 - Density Bonus for Affordable Housing <br /> In summary this item was presented to receive citizen comment on the <br /> 34 proposal to provide incentives for the development of affordable housing to low and <br /> 5 moderate income families. The Report of the Low-Moderate Income Housing Task Force, <br /> 6 completed September, 1987, included a recommendation to amend the Zoning Ordinance to <br /> 7 increase incentives for new construction of low and moderate-income housing. The <br /> 6 proposed amendment represents one tool which may be used to achieve that goal. It is <br /> 9 proposed that a density increase of up to 50% be permitted if a percentage of the lots <br /> ,0 or units are reserved for occupancy by, or sale to households which qualify as being in <br /> the low or moderate income bracket. The proposed provisions are most likely to be <br /> 2 utilized by non-profit organizations already intending to develop affordable housing, or <br /> 3 by developers/ landowners with suitable land of lesser value to donate in exchange for a <br /> 4 density increase. A more comprehensive and effective approach to the long-range <br /> 5 affordability of housing involves other major growth .management issues being studied or <br /> 6 discussed at this time, including watershed issues, the rural character, water and sewer <br /> 7 extensions, and environmental impact. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 4114 e. Public Hearing Procedures <br /> (1) Article 20.6 Public Hearing and Notice Thereof <br /> 21 In summary this item was presented to receive citizen comment on the <br /> _2 p-oposed amendment to the public hearing regulations to require that once opened, any <br /> 23 public hearing remain open until a final decision is made by the Board of County <br /> 24 Commissioners. The testimony received at a Public Hearing is on record as information <br /> ,5 considered by the Hearing Body in rendering its decision. Testimony received outside of <br /> 26 the Public Hearing may not be considered. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to <br /> 27 assure that all information received prior to the decison of the Board of County <br /> 28 Commissioners can be considered. If approved, the amendment would deem a public hearing <br /> 29 as open, from the initial hearing date until the time of the final decision. <br /> I 30 .. . <br /> 31 PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN JACOBS,. indicated that he had concerns about the Public <br /> 32 Hearing procedures. Specifically, the notion of how the Public Hearing is left open. <br /> 1 33 Be stated that it seemed to him that the process is becoming more difficult and the <br /> 34 Planning Board is making less informed and effective recommendations. They have <br /> 35 already entertained, in Public Hearing, all the pertinent information that the Planning <br /> 36 Board is to consider and they do not need to rehash everything that has happen before. <br /> 37 They make a recommendation based on all the information.the Board of Commissioners will <br /> 38 receive so that it adheres as closely as possible to the materials the Commissioners <br /> 39 will see. -. The changes that are proposed will negate a lot of the efficiency of the <br /> 40 process unless it is specified that the Public Hearing will remain open only to hear new <br /> "- 41 information.-- He asked that if the Public Hearing is left open for new information that <br /> 42 one of the stipulations be that the Commissioners would.determine whether the <br /> 43 information was significant enough to refer it back to the Planning Board. <br /> 44 <br /> -. .45 COMMISSIONER MARSHAL[.. indicated that her understanding was that written information <br /> 46 could be accepted up until the time a decision is made but that verbal communication <br /> 47 could only be received up to the last Planning Board meeting. She indicated that she <br /> 48 was in agreement with that procedure. Also, citizens sometimes felt that they did not <br /> ' ! 49 need to go through the process if the Commissioners will accept information up until the <br /> 50 last moment. <br /> 51 <br /> I 72 CHAIRMAN CAREY indicated that he agreed with Commissioner Marshall. He stated that <br /> 53 he felt it should be limited after the Public Hearing to either written information or <br /> I: 54 limit it altogether or keep it open altogether. seeping it open for new information and <br /> 55 <br />