Agenda - 02-05-1990 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

IS Discussion with the Orange County Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) about these questions resulted in several changes to the original proposal. The changes are significant enough to warrant a second public hearing. Scearbo summarized the changes. A copy of the Staff report of the proposed amendment with changes underlined is an attachment to these minutes on pages The Planning Staff recommends that the proposed amendment be advertised for public hearing on February 26, 1990. MOTION: Best moved to accept the Planning Staff's recommendation. Seconded by Yuhasz . Waddell expressed concern that the equity question has not been answered for the homeowner to allow for possible decreases in median income and possible increased value of the house. VOTE: 8 in favor. 3 opposed (Abrams, Burklin, Waddell) . Best suggested that a member of the Tax Supervisor's Staff be present at the public hearing to answer questions regarding tax valuation of such dwellings. d. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments (1) Section IV-B-8 - Land Use Buffers (Section IV-B-8-e-3 Schedule of Required Land Use Buffers & Section IV-B-8-g Waiver of Land Use Buffer Requirements Presentation by Emily Crudup. Section IV-B-8-e-3 contains the Schedule of Required Land Use Buffers together with instructions on how to interpret the buffer table. Buffers between subdivisions and adjacent land are determined by the principal use within the subdivision and the adjacent zoning or land use. In the unzoned townships, however, undeveloped land is currently assumed to be residential for the purpose of determining if a buffer is required. The proposed amendment will refer to undeveloped land in unzoned townships as