Agenda - 02-05-1990 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

- D 0 IA 11; If flag Yuhasz asked if a fla lot had been considered 35 for this case since it seemed the soil constraints would meet conditions that allow flag lots. Scearbo responded no. She continued that it was not discovered until the plat was submitted that the well was in the right-of-way. Best asked why this request was brought to the Planning Board since a Class C private road less than 500' does not have to be inspected prior to recordation of the final plat. Scearbo responded because the legal right-of-way is still required to be 50' and a Road Maintenance Agreement is also required. Yuhasz stated that he would like Staff to " consider a flag lot as an option rather than the additional complication of a Road Maintenance Agreement and road signs. After discussion between Best and Yuhasz regarding driveways onto the Class C private road, Yuhasz noted that a condition could be added to that both driveways access the private road near the lot line. MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval of the partial width right- of-way and suggested that Staff review the request and if a flag lot is appropriate, that the owner be notified of that alternative. Seconded by Lewis. Jacobs noted the discussion from the December 18, 1989 minutes between Collins and Yuhasz that listed those situations in which flag lots are appropriate. From that discussion, he indicated he felt a flag lot would be appropriate in this case. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM #10: MATTERS HEARD AT 11127/89 PUBLIC HEARING 101 a. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments (1) Article 6. 15.2 Interim Development Standards b. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments (1) Section IV-C-2 Interim Development Standards Presentation by Marvin Collins.