Agenda - 02-05-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6 • dwellings and longer driveways were less likely to comply (see Attachment E) . 4 . Typical and square lots were more likely to comply than wide and narrow lots (see Attachments G , N, i, and fl . 5 . For all lots to comply, the minimum required lot size would have to be increased to 7 . 6 acres or the 4% impervious surface standard would have to be increased to 6. 11% (see Attachment At.) . 6. The average required minimum lot size for all lot configurations was 5 .05 acres while the average impervious surface ratio was 4. 03%. 2-Acre Lots For 2-acre lots, 416 design possibilities were derived using the factors identified above. General findings are as follows: 1 . Of the total number of scenarios, 123 or 29 . 6% complied with the 6% impervious surface standard while 70 .4% did not. 2 . Lots fronting on a Class hoH driveways were more likely smaller dwellings and shorter to comply (see Attachment 4- ) . 3. Lots fronting on apudrveways,were less likely dwellings and longer to comply (see Attachment G. ) . 4 . Typical and square oisotswere seemore Attachments to comply D , than wide and narrow and #12 ) . 5. For all lots to comply, the minimum required lot size would have to be increased to 4 . 0 acres or the 6% impervious surface standard would have to be increased to 11 .97% (see Attachment 1g) . 6. The average require��m�nac��slwhilesize thefor averagelot configurations was impervious surface ratio was 7 . 0%. Relationship to Actual Building Trends To determine if the scenarios developed with the spreadsheet template were representative of real-life situations,