Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> Letters To The Editor <br /> is a real danger that the opponents of pub- <br /> Support Triangle Express' lie transportation may succeed in reducing <br /> the scope at the rail system to the point <br /> I was appalled to read your editorial of where it 14111 not be able to attract rider- <br /> Oct 3 attacking the proposed—Triangle Ex- ship.Thus,I recommend full and unequivo- <br /> press"rail system by dubbing it"...an- cal support of the-Triangle le Express"by all <br /> other idea to pull the rug from under Due citizens and legislators who care abort the <br /> ham's economic future" long-term future of the Triangle metropoli- <br /> T'here are absolutely no data to justify tan area. ELLEN'COIF <br /> this opinion.In fact,all of the available data <br /> lead to just the oppns,ite conclusion.Look- <br /> ing ahead,not only at the next decade,but <br /> at the next century,Durham's economic fu- <br /> ture will depend on the development of ef- <br /> ficient,attractive and safe alternatives to <br /> automobile transportation. <br /> The'Triangle Ecpress"sounds as if it <br /> could be the first step in this director.For <br /> every person who uses the rail system <br /> there will be one less car on the highways. <br /> one less pa.-icing space used and a little less Li 2ht rail works <br /> pollution in the air.Good public tt-ansporta- <br /> lion would greatly increase economic and Once again our good friends at the. <br /> social opportunity for young.poor and state Department of Transportation <br /> handicapped citizens have plundered the truth. In what has <br /> I strongly support the proposal by Jim become a familiar and discordant re- <br /> Clark president of Save the Water,to de- train, they tell us that the Triangle le is <br /> velop a rail system lininrtg Durham.Rs• g <br /> Leigh,Cary and Chapel Hill.However,there With disdain they a point even larger <br /> With disdain they point to even larger <br /> urban areas where they imply light rail <br /> has failed. A planning engineer for the <br /> state says. 'Studies done on such sys- <br /> tems in Miami, Dallas and the [San <br /> Francisco) Bay area show ridership is <br /> much less than expected.. ." <br /> But the Bay Area Rapid Transit has <br /> operated at near-saturation levels. Dal- <br /> las has yet to begin construction of its <br /> system. And, as anyone with even a <br /> cursory knowledge of light-rail activity <br /> knows. Miami utterly botched its sys- <br /> tem. Bus systems classically serve as <br /> feeders to the rail stations. Miami <br /> dismantled its entire bus system <br /> cannibalized it. really, in a misbegotten <br /> effort to fund the light rail. <br /> The use of these examples to influence <br /> our judgment is scandalous.At the least. <br /> it is a mark of stunning ignorance.At the <br /> worse,it is the hand of callous deception. <br /> Light rail is succeeding around the <br /> country.Buffalo and Portland are prom- <br /> inent recent success stories. It is suc- <br /> ceeding where there is foresight and <br /> clarity of thinking. A review of the <br /> literature is in order. <br /> ROSS ALLARD <br /> Cary <br />