Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> • <br /> not brought us any choices,except <br /> a big bill for more highways." <br /> Sandy Ogburn. a Durham City. <br /> Council member,agreed. <br /> "Highway construction tends to <br /> be reactive. You can't build until <br /> the need is there,"she said."But <br /> this is taking a look down the road <br /> and is proactive." <br /> Continued from page 1C <br /> Raleigh and Durham are exam- <br /> To attract commuters, the sys- . ining proposals to build Outer <br /> tem might have communication Loops around their northern bor- <br /> Ex- <br /> cars wilh cellular phones and fax dcrs. The Northern Wake Ex- <br /> machines that would operate from pressway would cost 5x14 million <br /> 6 a.m.to 6 p.m. during the week. to 5433 million,while the Durham <br /> Under Mr.Clark's proposal,the Outer Loop would cost about 5350 <br /> rail system would be funded with million. Both projects are funded <br /> state transportation money and <br /> in a multibillion-dollar highway <br /> support from local governments, <br /> program approved this year by <br /> Operating costs would come from the o gram General Asseed ssembly. • <br /> the cities and towns it would Both the proposed roads cross <br /> serve. He gave no estimates for or are near watersheds and drink- <br /> the annual operating cost. ing water supplies, .11r. Clark <br /> Mr. Clark said the rail system said. "The highways would only <br /> could be developed in much less benefit the northern areas, which <br /> time than the proposed loops and happen to be in the most ecologi- <br /> could be in operation as soon as tally-sensitive areas we have."he <br /> the early 1990s. The only new said. <br /> track that would have to be built <br /> would be between Durham and As is currently proposed. the <br /> Chapel Hill. Durham loop would run near the <br /> The proposal has been sent to little River Reservoir, one of <br /> state Transportation Secretary Durham's major drinking water <br /> James E. Harrington for study. resources. It also would came <br /> But a spokesman for the Depart- close to Falls Lake. P.aleigh's <br /> ment of Transportation said Fri- matn water source. <br /> day that Mr. Harrington had not Designed to handle the area's <br /> •had an opportunity to review it. traffic needs through the year <br /> "We'll be happy to take a look at it 2010, both loop plans have been <br /> as we do with thousands of sug. criticized by neighborhood groups <br /> gestions from other citizens,"said and environmentalists, while <br /> James T. Sughrue, special assis- highway planners say the roads <br /> tans for public affairs. would relieve growing traffic con- <br /> Durham County Commissioner gestion. <br /> Rebecca Heron. who attended In Raleigh.the loop has become <br /> Friday's announcement, said the a campaign issue in the race for <br /> proposal was worth studying. mayor. Raleigh City Council <br /> "For the first time,we have an member Charles C. Meeker has <br /> alternative to move people," said questioned the need for the road, <br /> Mrs.Heron,who is also chairman while Mayor Avery C. Upchurch, <br /> of the Triangle J Council of who is seeking re-election, says <br /> Governments. "The Department the loop would ease traffic woes <br /> of Transportation certainly has for commuters in North Raleigh. <br />