Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-05-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 02-05-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:53:01 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:17:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/5/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> .r.-. - <br /> - . oru ::: .._ <br /> __ <br /> , .., <br /> _ . _ <br /> • . .. <br /> ; _ , <br /> • <br /> PAGE 4 <br /> THE CHAPEL HILL HERALD • WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1989 <br /> Editorial . • - <br /> •. .`Trian le Express'x .deserves study . <br /> The question of Triangle-wide mass transit is a Durham. - <br /> matter of when, not if. There is no question that a rail system would <br /> And we're inclined to join those who say the do less environmental damage than the huge loop <br /> sooner the better. • • . , roads the N.C.Department of Transportation is <br /> Durham's Jim Clark,with the environmental now planning for the Triangle.Interstates <br /> group Save the Water,has suggested the state consume land like locusts consume wheat.The <br /> construct a light rail passenger train system paved surfaces would introduce stormwater <br /> connecting Raleigh,Durham and Chapel Hill.He runoff in drinking supply watersheds north of <br /> proposes that the rail system could replace,the Durham and Raleigh. The interstates could lead to <br /> massive loop roads now slated for Raleigh and sprawling development that promotes heavy <br /> Durham. automobile commuting and eventually makes even <br /> While Clark may optimistic in saying that more roads necessary. <br /> loop roads won't be needed if the rail system were <br /> built,the so-called"Triangle Express" is an idea Orange County also has a big stake in the loop <br /> Well worth examining.And we join the Triangle J roads plan because Durham's bypass would cut a <br /> Council of Governments in urging the state to swath right into the relatively green area between <br /> consider it carefully as part of evaluating the Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. - <br /> damage that the proposed loop roads will cause to • Whether Clark's plan is a viable alternative to <br /> the environment the loop roads remains in question. But an area <br /> Clark has suggested that the state could put with the resources and vision of the Triangle <br /> together a passenger rail system for$300 million, ought to pay more than lip service to the truth <br /> far less than the 5750 million that would go into that mass transit, in the long run, is the best <br /> the loop roads.The proposed system would use 50 <br /> miles of existing railway roadbed, some of which answer. _ . <br /> is abondoned.The system would have 16 stations, We urge The state to take a long,hard look at <br /> including one each in Chapel Hill and southern the"Triangle Express." <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.