Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-08-1990
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1990
>
Agenda - 01-08-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 4:36:37 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 3:05:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/8/1990
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to <br /> e: <br /> Planning Department' s report and the Planning <br /> Board' s recommendation within forty-five (45 ) <br /> days of the Planning Board meeting at which the <br /> application was forwarded. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern with the statement "at <br /> the close of the meeting" and said he would like <br /> to know if a meeting could be closed before <br /> another is opened before he could vote in favor <br /> of such a recommendation. <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor. <br /> 3 opposed (Eddleman, Waddell, Yuhasz - for reason <br /> stated above) . <br /> (4 ) Section III-D-2-e - Preliminary Plat <br /> Approval <br /> Presentation by Emily Crudup. <br /> (A copy of the abstract an attachment to these <br /> minutes on pages . ) <br /> MOTION: Eidenier moved approval as recommended by the <br /> Planning Staff . Seconded by Best. <br /> Best asked if this amendment was generated by the <br /> Planning Staff . Crudup responded this wording <br /> was recommended by the County Attorney. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> Adjournment time was reached. <br /> MOTION: Best moved to extend the meeting to complete the <br /> agenda. Seconded by Eidenier. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Cantrell) . <br /> (5 ) Section IV-B-1 - Lot Standards <br /> Presentation by Emily Crudup. <br /> (A copy of the abstract an attachment to these <br /> minutes on pages • ) <br /> Yuhasz asked if the Health Department had been <br /> consulted regarding this amendment. Crudup <br /> responded they had been consulted at the <br /> beginning of the process and were in agreement. <br /> There was considerable discussion about the <br /> minimum lot sizes, particularly in regard to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.