Agenda - 01-08-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

II gi The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. Best asked why write it in such a way if it is not expected to happen. Collins responded just to make it clear with regard to what the intent of the watershed protection is . Best continued asking how it affected impervious surfaces . Collins responded that if the density bonus is increased by 25% in University Lake Watershed we would be departing from the recommended standard of -CDM of one unit per five acres . The more units allowed, the more difficult it will be to comply with a 4% impervious surface ratio. Best continued that he felt such an exclusionary clause was unnecessary. Eidenier expressed concern that there was no public direction from the public hearing. She continued that if the Transition Area is where the low cost housing seems to be going, she felt it would not be ill-planned to state that is where it should be. MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff . Seconded by Eddleman. VOTE: 6 in favor. 2 opposed (Best & Waddell - both felt that the amendment was unnecessary since the density bonuses would only occur in Transition Areas ) . (3 ) Article 8 . 2 . 1 -- Special Uses Presentation by Marvin Collins . (A copy of the abstract and complete information is an attachment to these minutes on pages . ) MOTION: Best moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff . Seconded by Yuhasz . VOTE: Unanimous . (4) Article 6 . 19 - Federal Wetlands Permits (Consider concurrently with Item #b( 6) Subdivision Regulations Text Amendment Section IV-B-11 - Wetlands) (Copies of the abstracts and information an attachment to these minutes on pages . ) MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval as recommended by the