Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-2006-5j
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 05-16-2006
>
Agenda - 05-16-2006-5j
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 8:54:55 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:27:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5j
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060516
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
51 <br />City of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 36 <br />88 o AA Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice <br />There were at least 98 sub prime lenders active in the City mortgage market.. While most <br />stab prime lenders are designated as mortgage companies, some sub prime lenders are <br />affiliated with prime lenders and might be listed differently by regulators. These lenders <br />accepted 1,383 applications in 2002, of this total the sixteen largest lenders had more than <br />65% of the total market. <br />Table 24 shows a list of the thirty -six largest sub prime lenders in the City of Cuyahoga <br />Falls. These sub prime lenders are for all loan types and purposes. Ameriquest Mortgage <br />has the largest market share of 9.9% with Household Finance Corporation close behind <br />with 8.1 %. It should be noted that Household Finance and Beneficial Finance (the third <br />largest sub prime lender with 7.0% of the mortgage market) recently signed a letter of <br />agreement with the Ohio Attorney Generals Office regarding alleged predatory lending <br />practices. The agreement includes over 25 million dollars for past and current customers <br />as well as a change in their lending practices. <br />These two lenders controlled more than 10% of the sub prime market. In fact of the thirty <br />six largest lenders in the sub prime market sixteen lenders controlled more than 65% of that <br />market. <br />Figure 1 compares prime and sub prime lenders in the home mortgage market in the City. <br />Prime lenders had more than twice as many applications as sub prime lenders, 3,955 as <br />opposed to 1,383 originations were higher. When comparing originations prime lenders <br />originated more than 75% of their applications while sub prime lenders werejust under 50% <br />in originations. Denials were close with prime lenders denying 10.7% of their applications <br />and sub prime lenders denying 204%. One of the largest areas of difference were in <br />applications withdrawn by the borrower, prime lenders had 7% of their applications <br />withdrawn, while sub prime lenders had 21 % of their applications withdrawn. <br />While the presence of sub prime lenders is important in assuring that all households have <br />access to lending, it can be a concern when lenders who have no commitment to the <br />community are dominating the market. <br />As long as the market is dominated by out of town and state lenders it will be difficult to <br />encouragethem to be more responsiveto the community's needs. Local lenders participate <br />in the community in many ways, the arts, education and loan products that offer reasonable <br />options. They see that they have a commitment to the community and want to do what <br />they can to help, They benefits are two fold, they get high marks in their Community <br />Reinvestment Act reviews and encourage residents to become customers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.