Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-16-2006-5j
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 05-16-2006
>
Agenda - 05-16-2006-5j
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 8:54:55 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:27:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/16/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5j
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060516
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M., <br />City of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 28 <br />A8 o N88 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice <br />companion /service animals or will an accommodation be made?" If a person who has a <br />companion /service animal is looking for an apartment, they will generally bypass "no -pet' <br />ads rather than hassle trying to work out the accommodation. The ideal situation would <br />be for those with this restriction to include in their advertising <br />" except companion animals." <br />Although there were a few "No Section 8" or "No HUD" advertising observed, it should be <br />noted that there is a concern when this statement is be found in rental advertising. Even <br />though the source of income and rental assistance are not protected under state or federal <br />fair housing law, those who receive assistance can include minorities, women with children <br />and other protected classes. As a matter of fact the majority of users of rental assistance <br />programs are female headed households. Therefore, this type of an ad would be a "red <br />flag to discriminatory practices In addition, although there were only a few ads that <br />discouraged Section 8 vouchers, there was no advertising found that welcomed it. <br />A list of questionable words, phrases and symbols that inadvertently appear in advertising <br />has been included in Appendix 2, Although this list may seem extensive at first glance, a <br />publisher who is sensitive to the requirements of the law will quickly develop a sense of the <br />type of advertisements which may raise a question under the law. <br />In short, the basic test for any advertiser should be: Would the ordinary reader construe the <br />advertising as sending a message of preference for or against a particular class of home <br />seeker? <br />While no overt examples of discriminatory advertising was found in our review it is <br />imperative that the City constantly monitor local publications so that any problems can be <br />found early and action taken immediately. <br />6.0 - ZONING and HOUSING REGULATIONS <br />Another aspect of discrimination necessary to discuss is barriers to fair housing resulting <br />from zoning and subdivision regulations. Whether certain zoning and subdivision controls <br />are, in fact, discriminatory is controversial. However, several cities have been successfully <br />sued by the federal government over the manner in which they were zoned. <br />6.1 Potential Impact of Zoning and Housing Regulations on Fair Housing <br />A view of representative studies of the nature of zoning discrimination shows that, as <br />observed by Professor Richard T. Lai, Arizona State University, in his paper The Effect <br />of Exclusionary Zoning on Affordable Housing, "If land -use zoning for the purpose of <br />promoting reason, order and beauty in urban growth management is one side of the coin, <br />so can it be said that exclusion of housing affordable to low and moderate income groups <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.