Orange County NC Website
15 <br />Attachment to the Peer Review Report of Cherry Selcaert & Holland L.L.P. <br />Description of the Peer Review Process <br />Overview <br />Firms enrolled in the AICPA Center for Public Company Audit Firms (the Center) Peer Review <br />Program have their system of quality control periodically reviewed by independent peers. These <br />reviews are system and compliance oriented with the objectives of evaluation whether: <br />The reviewed fimr's system of quality control for its accounting and auditing practice <br />applicable to non-SEC issuers has been designed to meet the requirements of the Quality <br />Control Standards established by the AICPA. <br />The reviewed firm's quality control policies and procedures applicable to non-SEC <br />issuers were being complied with to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of <br />complying with professional standards. <br />A peer review is based on selective tests and directed at assessing whether the design of and <br />compliance with the firm's system of quality control for its accounting and auditing practice <br />applicable to non-SEC issuers provides the firm wilt reasonable, not absolute, assurance of <br />complying with professional standazds. Consequently a peer review on the firm's system of <br />quality control is noturtended to, and does not, provide assurance with respect to any individual <br />engagement conducted by the firm or that none of the financial statements audited by the fimt <br />should be restated. <br />The Center's Peer Review Committee (PRC) establishes and maintains peer review standards. <br />At regulaz meetings and through report evaluation task fo[nes, the PRC considers each peer <br />review, evaluates the reviewer's competence and performance, and examines every report, letter <br />of comments, and accompanying response from the reviewed firm that states its corrective action <br />plan before the peer review is finalized. The Center's staff' plays a Ivey role in overseeing the <br />performance of peer reviews working closely with the peer ['eview teams and the PRC. <br />Once the PRC accepts the Peer review reports, letters of comments, and reviewed firms' <br />responses, these documents are maintained in a file available to the public. In some situafions, <br />the public file also includes a signed undertaldng by the firm agreeing to specific follow-up <br />action requested by the PR.C, <br />Firms that perfomt audits or play a substantial role in the audit of one or' more SEC issuers, as <br />defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Boazd (PCAOB), are required to be <br />registered with and have their accounting and auditing practice applicable to SEC issues <br />inspected by the PCAOB. Therefore, we did not review the firm's accounting and auditing <br />practice applicable to SEC issuers. <br />