Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 10-17-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-17-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 3:44:27 PM
Creation date
10/13/2017 9:59:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-17-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 1 pay statewide. OCS received approximately $112,862 for its drivers. On September 11, the <br /> 2 Board of Education approved a salary schedule for bus drivers that increase driver pay by an <br /> 3 average of surrounding districts. With this change, all drivers exceed the current living wage <br /> 4 level and approximately 27% of drivers exceed $15 per hour. OCS currently contracts with a <br /> 5 private firm for custodial service at nine of its 13 schools. An Alternate Bid obtained during the <br /> 6 initial solicitation in 2016 would have increased the bid cost over $245,000 for the bidder to pay <br /> 7 all employees a wage commensurate with Orange County's living wage at that time. Funding <br /> 8 constraints prohibited the award of the Alternate Bid. Recent discussions have challenged <br /> 9 District staff to consider options to the contract service delivery model. Preliminary cost data <br /> 10 indicates a minimum of$500,000 additional funding would be required to support an all OCS <br /> 11 staff custodial service. County Commissioners are aware of the OCS Board of Education's <br /> 12 desire to continue to honor its employees through a living wage commensurate with that set by <br /> 13 the County. However, the Board of Education is concerned about the long-term viability of <br /> 14 meeting the $15/hour living wage intended for FY2018 given funding constraints anticipated in <br /> 15 the FY2018 budget. <br /> 16 Pam Jones said OCS has based its living wage on the County's previous living wage, <br /> 17 despite the fact that the Board of County Commissioners raised it to $15 this year. She said <br /> 18 OCS is unable to afford that wage. <br /> 19 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the number of subcontractors who are local Orange <br /> 20 County residents is known. <br /> 21 Dr. Todd Wirt said 18 of 31 contracted employees live in Orange County. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Todd LoFrese reviewed the following information for CHCCS: <br /> 24 The Board of Education began paying a living wage in 2015-16 and formally adopted a living <br /> 25 wage policy in January 2017. All district employees are paid at or above the living wage rate. <br /> 26 The district requested an additional $700,000 expansion during the 2017-18 budget process to <br /> 27 pay a living wage for employees of contractors that have displaced or may displace district staff. <br /> 28 This was also a goal of our living wage policy. The district has two service contracts that fall into <br /> 29 this category, custodial evening cleaning services and our child nutrition program. In June 2017, <br /> 30 bids were opened for custodial cleaning services that included an option to pay a living wage. <br /> 31 As highlighted in the attached materials, the additional cost for paying a living wage was <br /> 32 approximately $300,000. We also conducted an analysis on the cost to internalize the positions. <br /> 33 That analysis required an even more sizable increase of over $1.6 million. Ultimately it was <br /> 34 decided that we could not proceed with either a living wage or internalizing positions as the <br /> 35 additional local funding received for 2017-18 was only sufficient to cover our continuation <br /> 36 expenses, not expansion requests. <br /> 37 Commissioner Jacobs asked if the living wage could be phased in over a period of time <br /> 38 to allow for more financial planning. <br /> 39 Todd LoFrese said this has not been discussed, but is something CHCCS could <br /> 40 consider. <br /> 41 Commissioner Rich asked if both schools systems would please consider this. <br /> 42 Steve Halkiotis asked if the number of Chapel Hill contracted employees that live in <br /> 43 Orange County is known. <br /> 44 Todd LoFrese said he does not know, but can research this. <br /> 45 Commissioner Marcoplos said he remembered a discussion about the added cost of <br /> 46 paying in house contractors would, in part, be due to more equipment and machinery. <br /> 47 Todd LoFrese said additional equipment would need to be purchased if contractors were <br /> 48 brought in house. He said the $1.6 million did not include this equipment, as it was just a wage <br /> 49 analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.