Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-11-2006-c1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 05-11-2006
>
Agenda - 05-11-2006-c1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 8:54:05 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:26:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/11/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060511
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
RES-2006-051A Resolution to Deny an Application to Amend the Joint Planning Area Zoning Atlas
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Analysis of this application is organized around the requirement of the Land Use Management <br />Ordinance that Article 4 of the Land Use Management Ordinance shall not be amended except a) <br />to conect a manifest error in the chapter; or b) because of changed or changing conditions in a <br />particular area or in the jurisdiction generally, or c) to achieve the purposes of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />A) A rezoning is justified to correct a manifest error. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record to date can be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: We were unable to identify any arguments in support of a manifest error. <br />Arguments in Opposition: The adjacent properties to the south and east of this site are located <br />within the Residential -1 zoning district. We do not believe that the current Residential -1 zoning <br />ofthis site is a manifest error. <br />B) A rezoning is justified because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area or <br />in the jurisdiction generally. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: The properties to the north and west contain higher density residential <br />units on R -SS -C zoning., <br />Arguments in Opposition: The area to the south and east of the site has retained its low density <br />development. <br />C) A rezoning is justified to achieve the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Staff Comment: We believe the information in the record thus far can be summarized as follows: <br />Arguments in Support: Arguments in support of this finding as offered in the attached applicant's <br />Statement of'Justification can be summarized as follows: <br />"This project will: <br />• Add the ability to build more units on Rusch Hollow Lot 3, The units will be affordable for <br />99 years to households earning at or below 50% of the area median income." [Applicant's <br />Statement] <br />• Contribute to a mix of housing in the Rogers Road community, which is already comprised of <br />a mix of mobile homes, recently constructed Habitat for Humanity Orange County single - <br />family homes, a number of modest older single - family homes, and a range of more expensive <br />single - family homes." [Applicant's Statement] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.