Browse
Search
Minutes 09-11-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 09-11-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2017 8:16:28 AM
Creation date
10/4/2017 8:03:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/11/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-11-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 09-11-2017 - QPH Mtg.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> • NC General Statute 153A-340 prohibits local governments from applying zoning <br /> regulations to bona fide farms and bona fide farm purposes including agriculture <br /> • NC Session Law 2017-108 clarified what constitutes a bona fide farm <br /> • General Statute 106-581.1 includes agritourism within the definition of agriculture <br /> • NC Session Law 2017-108—Bona fide farm status may be proved by the production of <br /> o A farm sales tax exemption certificate issued by the Department of Revenue. <br /> o A copy of the property tax listing showing that the property is eligible for <br /> participation in the present use value program pursuant to G.S. 105-277.3. <br /> o A copy of the farm owner's or operator's Schedule F from the owner's or <br /> operator's most recent federal income tax return. <br /> o A forest management plan. <br /> • By statute, production of any of these items is sufficient evidence to prove a property is <br /> used for farm purposes. However, a property owner may also produce evidence <br /> outside statutory requirements to demonstrate farm purposes. <br /> • LeByrd v Franklin County, 765 S.E.2d 805 (2014) "Zoning regulations are in derogation <br /> of common law rights and they cannot be construed to include or exclude by implication <br /> that which is not clearly [within] their express terms. It has been held that well-founded <br /> doubts as to the meaning of obscure provisions of a Zoning Ordinance should be <br /> resolved in favor of the free use of property." <br /> • Penalties for application of zoning ordinances against exempt property <br /> • Court Costs <br /> • Award of Attorneys fees. NCGS 6-21.7. (From the School of Government) <br /> o If a court finds that a city or county has acted outside the scope of its authority <br /> but did not abuse its discretion, the award of attorneys' fees and costs is up to <br /> the discretion of the trial judge. <br /> o A mandatory award is triggered only if the trial court makes a separate finding of <br /> abuse of discretion. <br /> o A finding of abuse of discretion appears to involve consideration of whether the <br /> city or county made a reasoned decision, factoring in how the decision was <br /> made and the circumstances surrounding it. But it cannot be based solely on <br /> the fact that the unlawful action was taken. <br /> • Damages- In addition to the potential responsibility for attorneys' fees and court costs <br /> there is the possibility of responsibility for other penalties such as money damages for <br /> lost income and business opportunities. Sovereign immunity may apply. <br /> Legal Issues Conclusion <br /> • For the past 5-6 years the legislature has repeatedly expanded the breadth of the <br /> agritourism exemption from local zoning authority <br /> • The Courts also view zoning authority to be subservient to the free use of property <br /> • There are serious penalties to local governments for exceeding the scope of their <br /> authority <br /> • Local governments must exercise great care in balancing the rights of property owners <br /> and the rights of neighboring property owners while acknowledging state law favors the <br /> free use of property <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is a specific process for the present use value <br /> program. <br /> John Roberts said there is a statutory list of the exact means of qualification. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.