Browse
Search
Minutes 09-11-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 09-11-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2017 8:16:28 AM
Creation date
10/4/2017 8:03:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/11/2017
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-11-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 09-11-2017 - QPH Mtg.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> Unified Development Ordinance, the statutory limitations on the County's authority, and the <br /> Board's polices on agritourism. <br /> This meeting is not a hearing on any particular situation, a forum for offering comment and/or <br /> updates on pending litigation, nor is this a question and answer session. Rather this meeting is <br /> an opportunity to improve communications and develop some shared understandings about <br /> County policies and the limitations of those policies. <br /> AGRITOURISM LEGAL SUMMARY <br /> Agritourism is a state and nationally recognized means of providing farmers the opportunity to <br /> generate streams of income outside the traditional production of crops or livestock. Many <br /> states have laws that authorize agritourism activities in conjunction with or related to traditional <br /> farming activities. Some states, including North Carolina, authorize agritourism activities <br /> without requiring traditional farming activities so long as same are conducted on a parcel or <br /> parcels that qualify as a bona fide farm. <br /> Some of the many activities recognized by the State of North Carolina as agritourism include <br /> but are not limited to: <br /> • Barnyard Animals, Fiber Animals, Farm Riding Trails, Walking Trails <br /> • Camping, Bird Watching, Fishing, Hunting <br /> • Farm Bed & Breakfasts, Country Cabins, Retreats, Parties, Weddings, Honeymoons <br /> • Hay Rides, Mazes, Pumpkin Patches, Quilt Barns, Farm Craft Events <br /> • Historic Farms, Reunions, Museums, Holiday Farms, Christmas Trees <br /> • Pick Your Own Farms, Farm Roadside Stands, Nurseries, Flowers , Picnics <br /> • School Field Trips, Summer Camps, Farm Vacations <br /> • Slow Food, Dining, Vineyards, Wineries <br /> Due to the broad authority for bona fide farms to host agritourism activities it has become <br /> increasingly difficult for local governments to distinguish, and thus prohibit, non-agricultural <br /> commercial activities from agritourism activities. In fact, local governments are specifically <br /> prohibited by Article 18, Chapter 153A of the North Carolina General Statutes from enforcing <br /> zoning regulations on properties that qualify as bona fide farms. <br /> LEGISLATIVE PREEMPTION AND LOCAL RESTRICTIONS <br /> Since approximately 2011 the North Carolina legislature has consistently expanded the <br /> authority of bona fide farm properties and agricultural operations to engage in activities that, <br /> while beneficial to the farm, have either been traditionally located in more urban or suburban <br /> environments or typically require a heightened/public review and approval process. The State <br /> legislature has even decided to punish local governments that attempt to enforce zoning and <br /> development ordinances against uses or activities occurring on bona fide farms by giving <br /> courts the authority to require the local governments to pay all the costs and the property <br /> owner's attorneys' fees resulting from the enforcement action. This could result in local <br /> governments facing hundreds of thousands of dollars in unbudgeted costs for enforcement <br /> actions that aren't clearly and specifically supported by law. <br /> In recent years North Carolina Courts have followed a similar path that restricts local <br /> government authority particularly with regard to property rights. A prime example of this is the <br /> case of Byrd v Franklin County, 765 S.E.2d 805 (2014) in which the Court held "Zoning <br /> regulations are in derogation of common law rights and they cannot be construed to include or <br /> exclude by implication that which is not clearly [within] their express terms. It has been held <br /> that well-founded doubts as to the meaning of obscure provisions of a Zoning Ordinance <br /> should be resolved in favor of the free use of property." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.