Orange County NC Website
z <br />In 2001-02, a Greene Tract Work Group comprised of elected representatives from each of the <br />LOG member jurisdictions began meeting to develop a concept plan for the remaining jointly <br />owned 104 acres of the Greene Tract. In .June 2002, the Work Group approved a resolution, <br />subsequently affirmed by all three jurisdictions, detailing recommendations that the three parties <br />agree to place a conservation easement on the 85,9-acre portion of the jointly held property that <br />was to be retained as open space, to ensure that future conservation would be achieved, The <br />other 18.1 acres of jointly owned property was targeted for future affordable housing, <br />County staff was asked to facilitate development of a conservation easement at same point in <br />the future, Accordingly, staff has periodically discussed this possible easement with Triangle <br />Land Conservancy (TLC), to assess that organization's interest in being the fourth- <br />party/easement holder on the 86 acres of jointly held open space. There has been positive <br />feedback from TLC, and in the last several months, these discussions have became more <br />formalized with renewed discussions about the Greene Tract. Site visits have been held and <br />the TLC Land Committee has recently recommended acceptance of this easement. The TLC <br />Board of Directors could consider approval of the easement in July. <br />The TLG Land Committee has also offered to hold an easement on the County's adjoining 60- <br />acre tract, if desired, As one of the few local governments with a formal land conservation <br />program in the Lands Legacy Program, the County could choose to enroll the 60 acres in that <br />program, and/or allow for a separate two-party easement to be placed on it, if additional <br />conservation limitations were desired,; Letters of March 24, 2000 from the BOCC to the Town <br />governing boards stated that "it is the`intent of the current Board of Commissioners that this <br />sixty acres remain undisturbed." While there was an assessment conducted of the property's <br />physical attributes at the time the 60 acres was conveyed, the BOCC has held no further formal <br />discussion of the County's plans for the 60 acres. <br />The 1999 interlocal agreement explicitly provided that "any non System use of any portion of <br />the remainder of the Greene Tract or any disposition of any portion of the remainder of the <br />Greene Tract shall result in payment to the County of the Reimbursement Amount for deposit in <br />the system enterprise fund", Arguably, a similar approach might be applied to any portion of the <br />County's 60 acres that are ultimately used for other than solid waste system purposes, The <br />calculation of the "Reimbursement Amount" is spelled out in the agreement, <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Greene Tract Work Group recommendations included a "triggering <br />mechanism" for reimbursements to the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund based on the placement of <br />former Greene Tract property under formal conservation easements, Estimated reimbursement <br />shares based on proportional LOG ownership shares (Orange County-43%; Carrboro - 14%; <br />Chapel Hill - 43%) of the original March 1984 Greene Tract acquisition cost of $608,823, are <br />noted in the attached document estimating reimbursement amounts. This information has been <br />distributed to the Town Managers of Carrboro and Chapel Hill. <br />If conservation easement(s) are granted to another party (for either the joint 86 acres and/or the <br />County's 60 acres), there would be transaction costs and potentially an endowment request <br />from the easement holder, These costs are not yet known. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board discuss matters related <br />to passible conservation easements on portions of the Greene Tract, and direct the Manager to <br />coordinate with the Chapel Hill and Carrboro Town Managers to develop a proposed <br />reimbursement schedule to the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund for discussion at the next <br />Assembly of Governments meeting in September 2006. <br />