Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-2006-5i
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 05-04-2006
>
Agenda - 05-04-2006-5i
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:37:39 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:24:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5i
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060504
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z~ <br />Craufurd Goodwin: Be sure to make corrections on your table before it goes to the BOCC, to <br />use the proper names. <br />Jay Bryan: Is there a motion? <br />Brian Dobyns: Can we make a motion for approval with a couple of conditions, such as Ted's <br />concern about others being consulted? I'm not as concerned about the term `residential' as <br />others are, but I'm concerned about the locked gates issue. <br />Glenn Bowles: We can insert some language about permanently locked gates. <br />Brian Dobyns: Motion to approve with the condition that a response from people previously <br />noted by the County Manager. <br />Michelle Kempinski: Wasn't there a question about the Zoning Officer dealing with the issues <br />of moral welfare? <br />Ted Triebel: I,just wanted to make certain that they (Planning Staff) were comfortable with <br />leaving the words `moral welfare' in the documents, since they aze responsible for enforcing it, <br />If a change is desired now, let's make it. <br />Robert Davis: I don't think that a change is needed now, We know that we look at the outside <br />azeas, and know how to regulate that, Irr terms of moral welfare, I'm not sure who is responsible. <br />Ted Triebel: That's my point. <br />Renee Price-Saunders: So, you wouldn't mind making a determination of an undesirable <br />situation? <br />Jay Bryan: We have a motion on the table. Is there a second? <br />Seconded by Craufurd Goodwin. <br />Jay Bryan: Would you like to make a friendly amendment? <br />Renee Price-Saunders: No. <br />Craig Benedict: Since we will be tallting with Social Services again, we'll ask if they will take it <br />under their purview to evaluate the moral standards. Let's keep the language in for now. <br />Ted Triebel: That can be added as a friendly addition to the motion for the Planning Staff to <br />check with Social Services to take this under their purview. <br />Brian Dobyns: I have no problem with that, <br />Jay Bryan: So if they aze willing to take this under their jurisdiction, we're OK with that? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.