Agenda - 04-18-2006-7b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8 each of the alternatives, but for purposes of the analysis, only one, which was believed to he most representative, was discussed, For example, in Alternative 2, TTA could assume more of an active management lead, in which case there could he impacts to the existing programs and staffing in each county. The goal was to he consistent and bring forward some additional level of detail for comparison, Zhe three alternatives and their respective organization charts are described below: Alternative 1, Moderate Coordination, retains the existing infrastructure for each county, Uut includes a formalized inter-county agreement and work plan to build more coordination opportunities, such as marketing, ADA paratransit liaison, eta In addition there would be some opportunity for expanding the proposed Triangle Area Paratransit Coordinating Committee to include public transit operators. This process would not meet the NCDOT definition of a region and would therefore not Ue eligible for additional regional funding as described below. Exhibit 1: Moderate Coordination Organization Clrart Moderate Coordination ~---- i i Administrative _Staff Support (xi rBranding/MarketSng Uf:3ubcommittee r•County Services Subcommittee integration ''ADA Paratransit Liaison Alternative 2 proposes Moderate Consolidation, where TTA would assume the role of the managing agency, but the operating responsibilities would still reside in the individual counties. In this alternative the managing role of TTA would be delineated through an inter-agency agreement between the counties and TTA and could include the potential for the management role of TTA to be expanded over time.. To qualify for NCDOT regional funding, TTA would be the recipient of NCDOT funding, and the services must be coordinated through TTA, This could result in the Triangle Regional Transportation Development Plmr - L'secutive Srnnmary