Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-18-2006-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 04-18-2006
>
Agenda - 04-18-2006-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:40:48 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:21:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/18/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060418
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ih' <br />lhalre County <br />Similar to Durham County, Wake County stands to benefit from a more uniform branding <br />of services and the added marketing effort a regional system could provide. While the <br />percentage of out-of county trips currently made by WCTS or the TRACS services is <br />relatively low, removing cost and operational barriers to regional trips will also benefit <br />customers, from both cost and scheduling standpoints. <br />Wake County is geographically the largest of the three counties, As a result, operations of <br />the TRACS coral general public service are divided into zones. This serves to control <br />costs, as smaller, independent vendors are contracted to operate in the different zones. <br />Passengers also pay a premium fare to cross zone boundaries within Wake County, In a <br />regional system with more extensive vehicle and labor resources, these ]imitations may <br />be mitigated, along with the cross county trips mentioned earlier, <br />An added benefit to each of the counties through the development of a more consolidated <br />system is that more efficient vehicle and trip scheduling will provide opportunities for <br />more trips to help meet increased demand. As the population in the counties continues to <br />increase significantly, and since the three county services are already reaching maximum <br />service limits based on the availability of resources, this benefit will increase in <br />importance.. <br />Summary of Potential Funding Impacts <br />The three alternatives may potentially impact the manner in which funds are distributed <br />within the region, including local, state and federal sources, Currently, the local funds <br />utilized by the counties fall into the following categories: passenger fares, contract <br />revenues (i.e., revenues for service provided to other agencies) and local contributions. <br />State funds for community transportation programs consist primarily of Rural Operating <br />Assistance Program (ROAP) funds. The three components of ROAP funds include: <br />Elderly and Disabled Transportation Assistance Program (EDTAP), Rural General Public <br />(RGP) Program, and Work First-Employment Transportation. In addition to ROAD, the <br />counties also receive state administration funds, The state funds also include applicable <br />federal funding, such as FTA Section 5.310 funds for the elderly and persons with <br />disabilities as well as Section 5311 rural funds. In addition, TTA receives other federal <br />funds such as 5307, which are formula funds for urban areas and 5309 that are capital <br />earmarks.. There is potential to add the miles and hours of community hansportation <br />services to increase the 5.307 formula share as well as for the community transportation <br />programs to receive Section 5309 capital earmarks. <br />Triangle Regraral Ti arrsportation Development Plan - Elecutive Summmry 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.