Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-05-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 09-05-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-05-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 10:33:13 AM
Creation date
9/5/2017 10:31:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/5/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-05-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said if the $1.7 million is allocated to capital, and the schools <br /> 2 already have monies in the capital budget, does this not release the monies in the capital <br /> 3 budget to be used for something else; or is capital spending being increased by $1.7 million. <br /> 4 Pam Jones said it is an effort to supplant with the additional funds. She said OCS <br /> 5 needs money for personnel salaries and for teacher assistants. <br /> 6 Commissioner McKee asked if the Board does not tag these funds with a particular use, <br /> 7 can the schools use the funds wherever needed. <br /> 8 Pam Jones said yes. She said it would be helpful if the additional monies being <br /> 9 discussed this evening were not allocated to the three previously mentioned categories, and the <br /> 10 schools could reallocate the funds according to the need, with the understanding that these <br /> 11 funds are a one time offer. <br /> 12 Chair Dorosin said it was his understanding that there are extensive unfunded capital <br /> 13 needs, and if the Board is saying to use the funds to address those needs, why will the schools <br /> 14 not do so. He said he is hearing that these funds will be used for operating expenses with the <br /> 15 understanding that the funds may not be available next year. <br /> 16 Pam Jones said the budget that the Board has proposed will not fund the OCS <br /> 17 continuation budget, and it is this budget that pays teachers, etc. She said OCS's first priority <br /> 18 will be to fund that budget, and these additional funds would have to go towards those costs. <br /> 19 Todd LoFrese, Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) Deputy Superintendent, said <br /> 20 if additional funding is granted, the CHCCS Board would have to discuss how to proceed, <br /> 21 including any impact from the state level decision-making. He said in meetings thus far, the <br /> 22 CHCCS administration has recommended that any additional funds be used for deferred <br /> 23 maintenance. <br /> 24 Commissioner Burroughs clarified that this additional funding does not enable CHCCS <br /> 25 to pay a living wage, reinstate Media Assistants, etc. <br /> 26 Todd LoFrese said no, these additional funds would not enable the requested operating <br /> 27 budget to be met. <br /> 28 Chair Dorosin asked if continuation budget can be met, given the change in required <br /> 29 salaries. <br /> 30 Todd LoFrese said it is still unclear what the General Assembly will do, but CHCCS <br /> 31 believes that the Manager's recommendation would meet their continuation expense needs. He <br /> 32 said the living wage, restoration of assistants, etc., were in the CHCCS expansion budget. <br /> 33 Commissioner Marcoplos asked Todd LoFrese if it is his assumption that the CHCCS <br /> 34 Board would use any additional funds to pay for lingering repairs, etc. <br /> 35 Todd LoFrese said that would be the Administration's recommendation to the CHCCS <br /> 36 Board. <br /> 37 Commissioner Marcoplos clarified that OCS needs are different than CHCCS. <br /> 38 Pam Jones said the difference between the two districts is that OCS has not met its <br /> 39 continuation budget, and any additional funds would need to go towards closing that gap. <br /> 40 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if there is an update regarding the subcontractors <br /> 41 receiving a living wage. <br /> 42 Todd LoFrese said there is about a $400,000 difference between the base bid, and the <br /> 43 submissions received for paying a living wage. He said the CHCCS Board has not discussed <br /> 44 prioritization and what happens at the local and state level will determine the course that <br /> 45 CHCCS takes. <br /> 46 Commissioner Marcoplos said it sounds like a living wage may be possible, but it is <br /> 47 uncertain at this time. <br /> 48 Todd LoFrese said a living wage would be ongoing, and thus part of the operating <br /> 49 budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.