Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
.„___ <br /> i.-?, <br /> . . <br /> L <br /> r <br /> P. <br /> 6. . . <br /> • Reply.' Parking has been removed from The streets indicated <br /> {7,4 <br /> VI <br /> 34,. The Planning D his noted that several single-family Iota do not <br /> meet the required minimum IOtwldth afforty-feet as outlined in section <br /> 117G.2(ij(5ci. We also recognize that a proposed text amendment <br /> ' might deem this comment moot Please revise &necessary. <br /> Reply: The text amendments have rnodiffed this requirement There are no restrictions <br /> r.� to lot sees. We have not modified Me dra v5ngs. <br /> J.6 <br /> OthatliggitationlParin� R�lad ammei <br /> 35. It appears That you possibly nave Includod a sidewalk along both sides of <br /> 0 the Homestead Road frontage. Is this coaster? Please clarify whether the <br /> tines in that area are in fact a sid lk, and if so, please label accordingly <br /> to include the proposed width of the sidewalk; <br /> F.7 <br /> (:1 . } pijr. A new sidewalk is 6ertrg Included only on the west side of Homestead Road <br /> r..1 and has been labeled as sc . <br /> L'j <br /> 'F 36. Please show all proposed bicycle lanes within right-of-ways; <br /> fij Reply: B!c}'018 lanes heve been been depicted and labeled. <br /> 37. Staff has concerns about the proposed location of SUMO on-street <br /> f s parking space. Upon consideration of topography, some proposed <br /> locations would allow cars parked on hills, in valleya, and just outside of <br /> currres, which would potentially create unsafe situations. Further, staff Is <br /> 17.:., rye mmending that you further consider whether the potential benefits of <br /> providing on-street parking In some areas. If you desire to leave I In <br /> . place, staff may request additional information to satisfy our qty <br /> P.,1 concerns. More generally, phase note that Section 6-'I8(14) of the Town <br /> Code has set a precedent for not allowing oar-street parking In'the arm of <br /> ., blke lanes., To that end, staff again asks you to furthor consider whether <br /> Li the potential benefits of on-street parking in certain IS might be <br /> outweighed by potential corrflicie. AutomobIie parking, and bicycles <br /> 11 potentially are In conflict with one another within your current design. <br /> Sthff recognizes that the NCDOT TND road standards (text amendment <br /> pending) may allow this type of design, but we must MITI consider <br /> [1 whether the design potentially creates unsafe situations. A reasonable <br /> compromise might be to allow on-street parking on only one side of the <br />