Agenda - 10-09-2002 - C.1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. • . . , i.„ '..;. !c-o ril k.4 . . P Parks and Recreation Dated: May 22, 2002 RCarol Rosamond 1. it was difficult to tell homer close the left entrance playfield edge was to the F�.;; sidewalk/street. Depending on the amount of space-some sort of buffsr in [id addition to the entrance trees might be needed. I could s@9 a frlsbce or ball doing into street and posing a safety herd. Although its for the 0 neighborhood, a few more parking spy by the soccer field area would he nice but I Imagine they have met or exceed the amount needed, and realize prldng may not even be required In that area at all. The inclusion of �,. neighborhood bicycles was a nice addition.. . Rep/y: The comments baveben noted, Additional distance and vertic1e separation v:1 k.) have been added to better buffer the p/ey field area from the mein entrance, 2. Ani;hese V2«Is aligned with our proposed greenways At this point that's 11: all I can comment on. LA Reply: The proposed greenwars ar-s as is requfred and designated on the pmposed greenway and trail p! n. 3. When Richard left, i#was my understanding that your office would make sure that point requirer+non#s were being met and contact me if you had areas of • concern. p. 6 Reply: The recreation points have been complied with. E . NCDOT S.D. DCxon • L;.:: Aprit112002 • r .: Per your request, a review of the above mentioned subject has been completed Li . by the NCDOT Graham District Eelow for your file Is a list of.our recommendation and comments for the subject: • L1. Prior to any construction of any new access or alteration of any existing access within the right away, the devc?operlowner is required to •1 secure a permit with this offoa. It is the responsibility of the Li ownen'developer to obtain a permit f,