Agenda - 10-09-2002 - C.1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

r : r- ;61 2. It appears that a porturi of E. Winmore Avenue is being directed to R.L'i Bioretenlion Area #2. The area does not appear to be included In the computations for BA . Reply. The s#ormweter management plan his been completely re-designed from the prevus submittal. It is believed that this eoinrrrent his beer addressed with the reconfigured sionnwater management sytem- �:.,� 3. Portions an the eastern and northern sides of Hagan Park Drive do not L:71 appear to be dfrected to any of the sfivrrnwa#er quality structures. Provide justification for vegetative buffer. El • Reply: The stonnwater management pJen has been completely re-designed ftorn the previous submittal. It is believed that this comment has been addressed with the 0 reconfigured stanmwater management system. El . • 4. Portions of E. 1Ninmore Avenue do not appear to be directed to any of the ��' . stnrmwar quality structures. Frovidejustification forvege tative buffer. L:i L'i.a Fe,*: Mks is indicated in the narrative for the revised s#ormwater management plan, only a smail portion of the site impervious surfaces (J.4%) bypass ammeter #teatmerr!facilr7ies. Of This 9.4%, only 37.196 is roadway surface (O. 6ac). The site starrrnerafermanagerrrent plan as designed, removes a computed 85.39A of TSS in s#ormwaier runoff: r-.! ri''.;i s. Lets 87-90 do not appear to be directed to any of the atormwater quality structure. Provide JusWlcalion for vegetative buffer. 4'y Li Reply: : Per ilS fphon$ conversation with Henry Iiiitli$, ( J2), this is E acC9'� "C�p Sif�Le @ffOVt�?aS been�7r�C�e CBptZN6 aS�?7uG`�i iA?f�P,i'Yf1S Suf�s',lGe a5 is pracbtabde. Add!tTona/!y, the sfle as designed removes a coput 85%+ of TSS In sfonriwaier runoff. [ ; La G. The 24 Affordable Hou&ng Units at the end of S. Preston Park Drive do not appoar to be directed to any staemwater qualfty structure. Provide Juslification for veg tive bar. Rep/y: This has been corrected. This area now drains to WO facility#,3.