Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> . <br /> I I <br /> 17 <br /> Reply: Noted. A bridge design for this crossing is currently being developed, <br /> IA <br /> 4. Roads should span the tributaries with properly sized open b om <br /> r <br /> c u l ver'ts a with minimal ch annel i zatio n, minimal disturbance, and allowing <br /> stable stream bank-full flow conditions. <br /> [7.., <br /> Reply, We a currently showing full-invert F units at these trout <br /> .,.:: <br /> o frw_ We are investigating the use of an o nab om structure, including scour <br /> r.• : analysis required for each crossing_ <br /> .I <br /> t1•11 <br /> .ti. • <br /> 5. There appea rS to be very Iittl€ overlap between the proposer, greenway <br /> 2. <br /> trails and OWASA easement. Trail proposed on east aide of bend in <br /> creek along slopes in haviIy wooded area. Development of trail would <br /> require clearing of hardwoods (even if not specimen trees). Evaluate <br /> L potential for gree nway path to overlay easement. (SP3). <br /> Reply: This comment has bur) noted and we have relocated the greernivay trail so <br /> L that it is 017 the edge of the b u r where it can have minimum impact <br /> FI ti <br /> r:::,-. <br /> 6. "Construction rec d i ng stockpile area" appears to be near wetland <br /> 1.:.. an cUo r <br /> wooded area, and should be situated away from wetlands and <br /> hardwood areas to minimize disturbances. Provide details on what this <br /> '~L.4 will be used for, how it•will be used, how frequently tI material will be <br /> removed, and plan for final closure and stabilization. Provide measures <br /> to assure no toxic materials or containers am accumulated in the <br /> ....4: <br /> it stockpiled area (PP-I). . <br /> Reply:This area has been removed from our plans, <br /> L <br /> � <br /> , 7. Proposed new wetlands at the western edge of project adjacent to power <br /> line appear to be in an existing wetland I riparian area. Constructed <br /> wetlands should be developed without destruction, or functional <br /> p impairment of existing wetlands and riparian buffer areas (FF4; UP-I). <br /> • Reply: This has been re-designed. No tai orstenti ors areas or storm ater wet f ari d are <br /> r' • now prôpoed in n this area <br /> L . <br /> r7 E: 8. The amount of area occupied by the post - construction storm water <br /> L L.;? man agement �r��� shown �r �� plans �h�u!� not be included i n <br /> calculations to meet open space requirements unless enough detair can <br /> 11 h e shown to demonstrate that they will t be compatible with and <br /> L <br /> . . <br /> . . <br />