Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-29-2002 - 4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-29-2002
>
Agenda - 08-29-2002 - 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2017 2:12:16 PM
Creation date
7/18/2017 2:08:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/29/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020829
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Staff Report for August 29 2002 <br /> Board of County Commissioners Work Session <br /> Growth Control Issues <br /> ISSUE 1: Identify the details of a proposed moratoria including: size and scale of a large <br /> residential project. <br /> RESPONSE: August 7th, 2002,the Planning Board agreed to define large development <br /> as any subdivision with 20 or more lots. <br /> ISSUE 2: Determine what"pipeline"proposals would be affected. <br /> RESPONSE: The Planning Bo ' discussed three"pipeline"options at which to stop an <br /> existing project: <br /> 1.)A subdivision that has been submitted to staff, <br /> 2.)The project's concept plan has been approved by the Planning Board, <br /> 3.)A project that has been issued a formal preliminary approval by the BOCC. <br /> ISS 1' 3: List the steps necessary to produce/implement a limited growth moratorium or <br /> other growth control. <br /> RESPONSE: 1. Report to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners of June <br /> 18,2002, in response to the Orange County Planning Board"Growth Control Letter of <br /> May 6,2002. A moratorium could be enacted in the following time frame. The len!. of <br /> the moratorium would be coordinated with the completion of a unified development <br /> ordinance which would create a special use process for major subdivisions. The Planning <br /> Board has asked for additional time to process subdivision applications. The <br /> comprehensive plan land use element, adequate public facilities ordinance, and ordinance <br /> revisions regarding water resource issues would be concurrently researched and <br /> implemented to some degree. <br /> The shortest regular timeframe for the enactment of a moratorium would be as follows: <br /> R uest for Legal Ad November 6,2002 <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing November 25,2002 <br /> Planning Board Action December 4,2002 <br /> BOCC Action December 10,2002 <br /> A shorter timeframe if requested could be accomplished by creating a special public <br /> hearing at a regular BOCC date. <br /> RESPONSE: 2. Unified Development Ordinance Definition <br /> A Unified Development Ordinance(UDO) is a combined land development code that <br /> integrates the present planning regulatory system of"free standing"co I es of subdivision, zoning, <br /> environmental impacts, erosion control,flood management and economic development. <br /> The Unified Development Ordinance creates a comprehensive and cross-referenced <br /> document, combines various land use controls in a different procedural context. For example, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.