Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-21-2006-9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 03-21-2006
>
Agenda - 03-21-2006-9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 5:47:44 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:16:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060321
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />1.3 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />2.3 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />.34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />4.3 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />DRAFT <br />7. Special Presentations <br />a. Receive Public Cc <br />~ ~, a~~ <br />~u~~~L CaMn~n~ <br />g <br />Commissioners <br />The Board received public comment on the Board's plan to pursue Proposal 5 along with <br />related items for a November 2006 referendum on district elections for the Board of County <br />Commissioners; to provide the Board with an opportunity to consider the content of a Resolution <br />calling for the referendum; and to give the Board the opportunity to provide comments, question <br />and any further direction to staff. <br />Chair Jacobs said that they had originally intended to hear public comment tonight and <br />then act, but since Commissioner Foushee is not here, they can hear the comments and then <br />take an action at the next meeting. <br />Geof Gledhill said that this is a process that had a beginning in January 2005 and there <br />have been a series of meetings and public hearings. The Board of County Commissioners on <br />February 16, 2006 approved Proposal 5, which says that there will be a total of five members on <br />the Board of County Commissioners in the district and at-large plan submitted to the voters. <br />The elections would continue to be partisan and the district map plan would have one member <br />from district 1 (all of the County except Chapel Hill Township); two members from district 2 <br />(Chapel Hill Township); and two at-large members. Members elected from the districts would <br />have to reside in the districts.. They would be nominated from members of their party <br />everywhere in the County and then ultimately elected by all voters in the County.. The Board <br />also confirmed that a referendum on Proposal 5 would be presented at a November 2006 <br />referendum. The Board also confirmed that the implementation of the district at-large system <br />would begin at the 2008 primary election. What has not been decided by the Board of County <br />Commissioners, but is presented for consideration tonight, is an implementation or transition <br />plan, He made reference to the map and the data that are available to the public. District 1 has <br />approximately 39,000 people and district 2 contains approximately 76,578 people (based on <br />2000 census data). <br />Chair Jacobs asked if the principles adopted by the County Commissioners were <br />available to the public, and it was answered no, He read same of the principles, which are <br />included in the agenda abstract, <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the proposal she came forward with had the possibility <br />of nominating by district or just having people reside in districts. She pointed out that the Board <br />of County Commissioners voted 3-2 to make these residency districts. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />Artie Franklin lives in Chapel Hill and made reference to page three, paragraph one of <br />the abstract. He said that he found Commissioner Cordon's suggestions logical, but he hopes <br />that the Board will consider changing the references to the at-large seat to a countywide seat. <br />He thinks that the at-large seat and at-large elections could lead to some confusion., Also, in the <br />next paragraph regarding the publication of the resolutions, the News of Qrange and the Chapel <br />Hill Herald were both specifically mentioned. He asked that they also consider adding The <br />Chapel Hill News and The Daily Tarheel because it would increase the opportunity of Grange <br />County residents to receive notice. He said that there have been comments by County <br />Commissioners that the district representation proposal under consideration is a start.. He said <br />that it might be helpful to add an evaluation process to measure the effectiveness of and to <br />provide for improving the proposal should it pass in November. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.