Browse
Search
2017-278-E Planning - TischlerBise for Payment In Lieu report
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2010's
>
2017
>
2017-278-E Planning - TischlerBise for Payment In Lieu report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2018 9:56:32 AM
Creation date
7/10/2017 10:14:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contract
Date
6/30/2017
Contract Starting Date
6/30/2017
Contract Document Type
Agreement - Consulting
Amount
$41,500.00
Document Relationships
R 2017-278-E Planning - TischlerBise for Payment In Lieu report
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\Contract Routing Sheets\Routing Sheets\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID:463F9D68-DFE3-4C3B-91 B7-2C2231A6F350 <br /> Proposal for a Fee in Lieu of Park Land Methdology Update Orange County,North Carolina <br /> • City of Tulare, California—Development Impact Fee Study <br /> • City of Durango, Colorado—Affordable Housing and Transit Linkage Fees <br /> • City of Louisville, Colorado—Impact Fee Study <br /> • Town of Mead, Colorado—Impact Fee Study <br /> • Prince George's County, Maryland—Parks Exaction Study <br /> • Manatee County, Florida—Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study <br /> • City of Las Cruces, New Mexico—Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Study <br /> • City of West Jordan, Utah—Impact Fee Study <br /> PROJECT LITY CONTROL PROCESS <br /> For our projects, we utilize a project management process that ensures projects are completed on time, <br /> within budget, and most importantly, yield results that match our clients' expectations. TischlerBise will <br /> provide seamless support to the County's project by convening weekly to assess the status of the <br /> project. Mr. Bise will ensure that staffing resources are well-matched to provide the highest quality work <br /> product, high responsiveness to the County, and to keep the project on schedule. Our approach to <br /> resolving issues that may be encountered during the project is simple: identify the possible challenges <br /> early on and notify all project members in a timely manner. Early identification will allow TischlerBise <br /> time to strategize a solution from a proactive, rather than reactive, framework. Our project <br /> management plan utilizes the following principles common to successful projects: <br /> • First, we will review the project goals and objectives. As part of our Project Initiation activities, <br /> Carson Bise, assisted by Ben Griffin, will revisit the final project goals and objectives in collaboration <br /> with County staff, list potential challenges to the process, and develop a plan to ensure successful <br /> outcomes and effective communication. <br /> • Second, we will plan the project schedule. Mr. Bise and Mr. Griffin will work with County staff to <br /> create an agreed upon timetable to meet the project schedule. Prior to beginning the project, Mr. <br /> Bise will assign roles that will ensure the project is completed on time and within budget. <br /> • Third, we will actively manage the project process. Mr. Bise and Mr. Griffin have a long history of <br /> strong project management skills that are supported by past project successes (we encourage you to <br /> contact our references in this regard). They will manage the work in progress, provide guidance and <br /> oversight to staff, and will be accountable to the County for meeting the schedule, budget, and <br /> technical requirements of the project. Mr. Bise and Mr. Griffin will collaborate and frequently <br /> communicate with County staff by utilizing regularly-scheduled progress memorandums, e-mail <br /> status updates, conference calls, and meetings at County offices. <br /> • Finally, we will review all project deliverables and communication through a formal quality <br /> assurance process that requires review at the peer level, project manager level, and executive <br /> officer level. Prior to the delivery of work product to you and staff, deliverables will go through a <br /> structured quality assurance process involving up to three levels of review and utilizing a formal <br /> checklist tool. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.