Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-20-2017 - 8-h - Efland Sewer to Mebane, Phase 2 Extension – Construction Engineering and Inspection Services Contract for the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Utility Planning Area
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 06-20-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-20-2017 - 8-h - Efland Sewer to Mebane, Phase 2 Extension – Construction Engineering and Inspection Services Contract for the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Utility Planning Area
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2017 4:33:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2017 3:53:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8h
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-20-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br /> B. Subconsultants <br /> 1. Include a complete list of subconsultants and their anticipated role/scope of work in the project. <br /> If a subconsultant is proposed to share work of similar scope, such as design, provide a <br /> projection of the shared scope (i.e. Design 50% Firm/50% Consultant A). Respondents are <br /> expected to present their complete project team in the response. <br /> 2. Include a partnering commitment letter for the proposed project scope. <br /> 3. Since subconsultant qualifications will be evaluated similarly to the proposing firm's own <br /> design team, please ensure that complete information is included. <br /> 4. A description of the plan to involve MBE/WBE firms, including previous teaming experience. <br /> C. Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Mapping capabilities <br /> Provide a description of the firms and, in specific, the proposed teams experience with the <br /> following: <br /> 1. As noted previously, there are no reliable CAD files available for the project, only Portable <br /> Document Format (pdf) versions. Please address how your firm intends to perform the 5% or <br /> so required design edits to complete this project and your related experience with performing <br /> such edits, including the post-construction preparation of record (as-built) drawings. <br /> 2. AutoCAD — It is anticipated that the consultant will need to totally redesign and prepare the <br /> West Ten Pump Station site plan in AutoCAD. The County has planimetric base.dwg-file (no <br /> contours) dating back to 01/05/15. Please describe how you plan to redesign/recreate the <br /> pump station site plan and your/team's experience with similar challenges. <br /> 3. Topographic data in North Carolina State plane coordinates, NAD 83 and NAVD 88. <br /> 4. For any portions of the project drawings prepared in CAD, the consultant is expected to <br /> provide a version of drawings in ESRI shape file format suitable for ArcMap version 9.3 or <br /> current version used by the County. Please address your experience in exporting shape files. <br /> Section IV: Project Management Approach <br /> Note that Orange County will be responsible for all property owner and media liaison responsibilities. <br /> A. Provide a detailed narrative of the firm's perception of the project requirements and understanding <br /> that the Consultant will indemnify the County and the original design engineer for the design and <br /> take responsibility for the design of the system going forward. <br /> B. Outline any unique features or conditions that appear to need special attention and that the firm <br /> and proposed project team may be particularly well qualified to address. <br /> C. Verify that your firm can begin services as soon as the construction contract for the project has <br /> been signed and approved by the County Manager or Orange County Board of County <br /> Commissioners, as required. <br /> V. Additional Information <br /> Orange County also would like to invite respondents to share their experience regarding contract <br /> documents and respond to the following in their submission: <br /> 1. Preferred standard form of construction contract documents (i.e. EJCDC, AIA, firm standard, <br /> proprietary, etc.)? <br /> 2. Preferred guide documents for technical specifications (i.e. EJCDC, AIA, firm standard, <br /> proprietary, etc.)? <br /> 3. Postulation as to the effect on fees and schedule, if any, to integrate proprietary construction <br /> agreement, related general conditions, special provisions and/or related proprietary <br /> documents? <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.