Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 1 the Ordinance. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Legal advertisements for the public hearing were run on May 3 and May 10, in accordance with <br /> 4 statutory requirements. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The rollback of school impact fees to June 30, 2016 as compared to new <br /> 7 fees imposed on January 1, 2017 will decrease projected 2017-18 school impact fees revenues <br /> 8 by approximately $150,000 for both school districts combined. An annualized amount could be <br /> 9 approximately $300,000 but in the current year budget only one-half the year (i.e. 1/1/17 to <br /> 10 6/30/17) was subject to the new fee structure. These projected numbers are derived from a <br /> 11 variety of assumptions including an estimated number of units per year and a unique <br /> 12 percentage mix of housing types per school district. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Recent analysis portends that the decrease would be less than even the projected $150,000 <br /> 15 because of the `grandfathering' provisions that allowed certain `approved' projects to utilize the <br /> 16 prior 2016 rate. The BOCC adopted a `break even' fee structure in November 2016 that <br /> 17 approximated total revenues from the old fees schedule and new fee schedule albeit with the <br /> 18 redistribution of fees based on unit type and bedroom count that reflected commensurate <br /> 19 student generation rates and impacts. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Some reimbursements are anticipated where higher 2017 rates were permitted and paid in <br /> 22 2017. The amount is negligible in Orange County Schools since most units are single family <br /> 23 and 2017 rates were lower in the short term and new multifamily construction had not occurred <br /> 24 in this year's limited timeframe. Reimbursements in Chapel Hill/Carrboro school district are <br /> 25 being researched but due to the short 2017 fee period and grandfathering provisions, the <br /> 26 financial impact will likely be less than $50,000. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Chair Dorosin asked if there are any newer updates on the bills. <br /> 29 John Roberts said both bills are currently in the Senate Rules and Operations <br /> 30 committee. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price referred to the two schedules in their packets containing blue and <br /> 32 red numbers, and asked if these figures could be clarified. <br /> 33 John Roberts said the blue numbers represent what was in place, and it is <br /> 34 recommended that the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) leave the age restricted units <br /> 35 and single family detached under 800 square feet in place, as these are lower rates than what <br /> 36 would otherwise be paid. <br /> 37 Commissioner Marcoplos asked if the number of single family detached 0-3 bedrooms <br /> 38 dealt with in the past year is known, as well as single-family detached 4+ bedrooms. <br /> 39 Commissioner Rich said this information was part of the discussion last fall, and can be <br /> 40 found in the records. <br /> 41 Commissioner Marcoplos said the large impact fee attracted the attention of those who <br /> 42 opposed it, and there is a large number again, and he is unsure of the implications. <br /> 43 Chair Dorosin said one implication is the escalating fees, and the BOCC changed from <br /> 44 the type of house to the number of bedrooms. He said it is now back to broader categories. <br /> 45 Commissioner Marcoplos said there seems to be a large increase of the 0-3 bedrooms, <br /> 46 single family detached. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Burroughs to <br /> 49 open the public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Educational Facilities Impact Fee <br /> 50 Ordinance. <br />