Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> • As part of the annual CIP process, the County identifies Capital Projects for potential <br /> debt funding. The CIP includes Installment Purchase Contracts / Limited Obligation <br /> Bonds as well as General Obligation Bonds approved during the November 2016 <br /> Referendum. <br /> • Future debt is assumed to be funded under the following assumptions: <br /> — Issuance Date: Fiscal Year indicated in the CIP (mid-year) <br /> — First Payment: Fiscal Year following issuance <br /> — Short-Term Borrowings: 5 Year Term at 2.25% - 3.00% <br /> — Medium-Term Borrowings: 15 Year Term at 3.25% <br /> — Long-Term Borrowings: 20 Year Term at 4.00% - 4.50% <br /> • Key Debt Ratio Growth Assumptions: <br /> — Assessed Value — Natural Growth: 2018 & Beyond: 1.70% <br /> — General Fund Revenues — Natural Growth: 2018 & Beyond: 2.00% plus <br /> revenue derived from projected tax increases identified in the capital funding <br /> plan (note: revenues include sales tax). <br /> 2017 CIP Alternative #1 — Future Debt Financings- graph- page 21 <br /> Summary of Results —2017 CIP Alternative #1- page 22 <br /> Debt Affordability Analysis <br /> 2017 CIP Alternative #1 Debt— No Tax Adjustment- page 23 <br /> • FY 2018 Value of a Penny: $1,781,692 <br /> • Assumed FY 2019 & Beyond Growth Rate: 1.70% <br /> • Note: Without a tax increase, the County is forecasted to have shortfalls from FY 2019 <br /> to 2027 totaling $74,426,098. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said another bond, of comparable size, will be needed in the <br /> future, and asked if there is a timeline on this. <br /> Ted Cole said there are needs going forward, and the current CIP is being worked with. <br /> He said it is not demonstrated well on this page, but if the County moved forward with an <br /> upfront adjustment of 5.5 pennies, the County would have new dollars available for debt <br /> service in FY 2025. He said this particular CIP goes to FY 2022, and dollars are available <br /> beyond what is needed for this CIP beginning in FY 2025. He said the County could do a <br /> borrowing in 2024, and the new debt service would start in 2025. He said there is a little bit of <br /> a gap between 2022 and 2024, but that is likely the next CIP horizon, and there will be some <br /> debt affordability. He said this debt affordability has yet to be measured, but it is a <br /> continuation of this whole process. He said he could measure "x" million in 2024, 2025, 2026, <br /> etc. He said a GO bond authorization is good for a 7-year period, and it is fairly <br /> straightforward to get it extended to 10 years. He said this debt should be fully issued by FY <br /> 2022, which is on a somewhat aggressive schedule, and there may be a couple of years that <br /> they could stretch GO authorization out to 2024. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said when the Board passed a bond in 2016, he doubted that <br /> the public realized that other comparable projects would not be able to be accomplished until <br /> 2029. He said he does not think projects were prioritized with this in mind. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if the possibility of pushing out anything would depend on <br /> when the projects were built. <br />