Browse
Search
Minutes 05-09-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 05-09-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2017 8:13:41 AM
Creation date
6/7/2017 8:10:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/9/2017
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1. Discuss and Prioritize Capital Projects in the Manager’s Recommended FY 2017-22 Capital Investment Plan
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1.2 Attachment 2 FY 2017-22 Capital Investment Plan Alternative 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1.3 Attachment 3 Davenport and Company County Tax Supported CIP Discussion Materials
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2. Financial Policies Discussion (General Fund Balance and Debt Management)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2.1 Fund Balance Policy
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2.2 Debt Management Policy
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
RES-2017-028 Resolution Opposing A Proposal Before the UNC Board of Governors to Prohibit Centers and Institutes From Participating in Litigation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> — 2018 & Beyond: 1.70% <br /> • The County has a Financial Policy setting a maximum Tax Supported Debt to Assessed <br /> Value of 3.0%. <br /> Key Debt Ratio: Tax Supported Debt Service vs. Governmental Expenditures <br /> TS Debt Service vs. Gov't Expenditures Peer Comparative (Lower is Better) <br /> • Rating Considerations: <br /> — Moody's: Moody's criteria allows for a scorecard adjustment if an issuer has <br /> very high or low debt service relative to its budget Percent. <br /> — S&P: The Debt and Contingent Liabilities section defines categories of Net <br /> Direct Debt as a % of Total Governmental Funds Expenditures as follows: <br /> o Very Strong: <8% <br /> o Strong: 8% to 15% <br /> o Adequate: 15% - 25% <br /> o Weak: 25% - 35% <br /> o Very Weak: > 35% <br /> • Existing Tax Supported Debt Service vs. Governmental Expenditures <br /> — FY 2017: 11.72% <br /> • Assumed Future Growth Rates <br /> — 2016 Adjusted Expenditures: $193,857,534 <br /> — 2017: 1.50% <br /> — 2018 & Beyond: 1.70% <br /> • The County does not have a Financial Policy setting a maximum Tax Supported Debt <br /> Service to Governmental Expenditures. However, the County has a policy setting a <br /> maximum Debt Service to General Fund Revenues of 15.0%. <br /> Key Debt Ratio: Tax Supported Debt Service vs. General Fund Revenues <br /> Tax Supported Debt Service vs. General Fund Revenues <br /> • Existing Tax Supported Debt Service vs. General Fund Revenues <br /> — FY 2017: 12.87% <br /> • Assumed Future Growth Rates <br /> — 2017 Original Budget : $203,116,868 <br /> z <br /> — 2018 Estimate : $209,221,031 <br /> — 2019 & Beyond: 2.00% <br /> • The County has a policy setting a maximum Tax Supported Debt Service to General <br /> Fund Revenues of 15.0%. <br /> 1 <br /> Excludes Fund Balance appropriation of$12,726,944. <br /> 2 <br /> Per County Staff. Excludes Fund Balance appropriation of$7,976,633. <br /> TS Debt Service vs. General Fund Revenues (Lower is Better) <br /> • Note: Peer comparative is estimated based on data available through Moody's MFRA. <br /> Debt Affordability Analysis - page 16 - graph <br /> Existing Debt <br /> • FY 2018 Value of a Penny: $1,781,692 <br /> • Assumed FY 2019 & Beyond Growth Rate: 1.70% <br /> Debt Capacity and Debt Affordability Analysis <br /> September 2015 Overview— Bond Referendum Discussion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.