Browse
Search
Minutes 05-09-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 05-09-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2017 8:13:41 AM
Creation date
6/7/2017 8:10:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/9/2017
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1. Discuss and Prioritize Capital Projects in the Manager’s Recommended FY 2017-22 Capital Investment Plan
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1.2 Attachment 2 FY 2017-22 Capital Investment Plan Alternative 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 1.3 Attachment 3 Davenport and Company County Tax Supported CIP Discussion Materials
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2. Financial Policies Discussion (General Fund Balance and Debt Management)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2.1 Fund Balance Policy
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 05-09-2017 - 2.2 Debt Management Policy
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 05-09-2017 - Work Session
RES-2017-028 Resolution Opposing A Proposal Before the UNC Board of Governors to Prohibit Centers and Institutes From Participating in Litigation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Year 4 to Years 6-10, and moved $600,000 from Year 5 to years 6-10. <br /> • Orange County Radio/Paging System Upgrades — removed $1,400,000 as there are <br /> current funds within this project to cover this expense. <br /> • Register of Deeds Automation — removed $400,000 for the software system purchase <br /> as there are current funds within the Automation and Enhancement Preservation Fund <br /> to <br /> cover this expense. <br /> • Mil!house Road Park— moved $300,000 from Year 2 to Year 4, and moved <br /> $6,400,000 <br /> from Year 3 to Year 5. <br /> • Northeast District Park— moved $350,000 from Year 3 to Year 5, and moved <br /> 7,650,000 from Year 4 to Years 6-10. <br /> The County's financial advisor, Davenport and Company, will present additional information <br /> (See Attachment 3) regarding the following possible options to consider as it relates to <br /> exceeding the policy and/or addressing cash flow shortfalls: (1) Consider alternative debt <br /> restructuring flexibility from the Local Government Commission (LGC), in order to fund the <br /> scheduled CIP projects within the policy threshold, and reduce cash flow shortfalls; (2) <br /> Implement tax rate adjustments to minimize or eliminate cash flow shortfalls. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: <br /> There is no immediate financial impact associated with discussion and prioritization of the FY <br /> 2017-22 Capital Investment Plan. It is a long-range financial planning tool with a financial <br /> impact in FY 2017-18, if the first year of the CIP is approved by the Board of County <br /> Commissioners with the adoption of the Annual Budget. <br /> Ted Cole, Davenport and Company Senior Vice President, made the following <br /> PowerPoint presentation: <br /> County Tax Supported CIP Discussion Materials <br /> Orange County, North Carolina <br /> Credit Rating Overview and Peer Comparatives- graph <br /> Peer Comparative Introduction <br /> • The County is currently rated AAA by Moody's Investors Service (May 2015), AAA by <br /> Standard and Poor's (June 2015), and AAA by Fitch (June 2015). <br /> • The following pages contain peer comparatives based on the Moody's AAA peer <br /> counties listed below. <br /> — National AAA Counties — 93 Credits <br /> — North Carolina AAA Counties - 9 Credits <br /> o Buncombe, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg, New Hanover, <br /> Orange, Union, Wake <br /> Historical Credit Spreads <br /> • The County's credit rating has a direct impact on the cost of borrowing, which in turn <br /> affects the County's debt capacity. <br /> — The credit spread is the premium an issuer pays to the purchaser of their <br /> bonds (i.e. higher interest rate) as compensation for increased credit risk. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.