Orange County NC Website
27 <br /> Travis LePage <br /> Orange County Project Director <br /> tlepage @fedeng.com <br /> 585-507-9731 <br /> Questions <br /> Commissioner McKee clarified that the differential between using Durham County's <br /> CORE system and Orange County's CORE system is $3 million. <br /> Cliff Brown said it is about $2.8 million. <br /> Commissioner McKee said the cost is $3 million more than the $29 million shown there, <br /> and the end result, if Orange County were to build its own independent system; or would it be <br /> more than the $3 million. <br /> Cliff Brown referred to alternative 2 on page 25, and said that is a stand-alone system <br /> that includes Orange County's own core. He said that is not sharing anything, and a shared <br /> system is $26 million. <br /> Commissioner McKee said 17 towers will be needed, if 200 foot towers are used. He <br /> asked if the number of towers needed could be identified, if the towers were 300 feet. <br /> Cliff Brown said he does not yet have this information. He said 200 feet is a magic <br /> number, both within the County's UDO and with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). He <br /> said towers over 200 feet must be marked with a light, and most residents have concerns <br /> about this. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if it would be possible to explore going to a higher tower <br /> and reducing the number of towers, so that money could be saved and used for the CORE <br /> System. He said in a shared system, Orange County will not be the primary partner; and while <br /> there can be good faith negotiations, there will always be unanticipated events that occur. He <br /> said potential problems will need to be heavily analyzed if a shared system is to be considered. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if the reduction of towers, due to increased heights, could <br /> be researched. <br /> Cliff Brown said yes. He said, on average, a brand new site for a tower is about $1.4 <br /> million, including equipment, prepping the land, etc. He said higher towers cost more money, <br /> but there would be less land costs. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said he lives 11 miles outside of Carrboro, and suggested <br /> putting the tall towers in Chapel Hill and Carrboro, as the blinking lights would blend in with the <br /> urban landscape; and put the unblinking lights in the rural areas. He said to use a hybrid <br /> system of towers. <br /> Cliff Brown said guidance from the County is welcomed. He said existing structures are <br /> being considered as well, such as the University of North Carolina (UNC) and a building just <br /> over the Durham County line. He said the 700-800 system, which is the long term solution for <br /> the County, are also VHF sites, which would eliminate duplication. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said as far as siting taller towers, the County looked at bird <br /> flyways in considering the location of higher towers, which kill birds. He said lower towers were <br /> preferred for this reason, and Craig Benedict may have that information. He said the Audubon <br /> Society may also be helpful. <br /> Chair Dorosin asked if the County will have to pay fees to Durham if it uses a shared <br /> system. <br /> Cliff Brown said yes, and this cost is not factored into the cost estimates reviewed this <br /> evening. He said the costs identified this evening are only capital costs. He said the fees <br /> depend on how many users are in the system, but the initial quotes range from $50,000- <br /> $100,000 annually. <br />