Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-06-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 06-06-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-06-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2017 8:08:09 AM
Creation date
6/2/2017 9:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/6/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-06-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> 1 o 6.29 acres OWASA Long Term Interest Area to Hillsborough Primary Service <br /> 2 Area <br /> 3 o 3.7 acres Hillsborough Long Term Interest Area to OWASA Long Term Interest <br /> 4 Area <br /> 5 o 0.13 acres Hillsborough Primary Service Area to OWASA Long Term Interest <br /> 6 Area <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Hillsborough EDD Area Amendments — Designations, if Adopted (map) <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Subsequent Considerations — Hillsborough EDD Area <br /> 11 • If WASMPBA amendments are approved the following would likely be proposed for <br /> 12 amendment later this year (quarterly public hearing required; possibly September QPH): <br /> 13 o Joint Land Use Plan with Hillsborough <br /> 14 o County Future Land Use Map <br /> 15 o County zoning amendments (possibly) <br /> 16 • These are in addition to the MPD-CZ application currently scheduled for the September <br /> 17 QPH (which does not include the entire area included in the WASMPBA amendments). <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Commissioner Jacobs asked if Davis Road is changing to a primary service area for <br /> 20 Hillsborough, and if Davis Road is the border of the rural buffer. <br /> 21 Perdita Holtz said that is one of the land use plan amendments that might need to be <br /> 22 made later this year. She said it is the rural buffer, but the rural buffer should follow the <br /> 23 watershed line, and this does not as the watershed line is a bit further south. She said in 2001 <br /> 24 the best available data was used to determine that line, and now there are more refinements <br /> 25 that can be used with GIS, and so the line is not really the line. <br /> 26 Commissioner Jacobs said this makes perfect sense in the abstract, but in the real <br /> 27 world this does not work because a lot of people live or own land in this area. He said if these <br /> 28 people miss the public hearing, they will not know that this area will be re-zoned due to more <br /> 29 accurate data. <br /> 30 Perdita Holtz said that is essentially what is proposed, and staff will notify all landowners <br /> 31 of the re-zoning and the public hearing. <br /> 32 Craig Benedict said the amount of acreage is not taking an entire property, within one <br /> 33 designation, and switching it to another. He reviewed a map to show examples. He said <br /> 34 moving the boundary to its originally intended location will stabilize this line. He said staff will <br /> 35 be happy to meet with any residents. <br /> 36 Commissioner Jacobs asked if staff would do a community meeting prior to the public <br /> 37 hearing. <br /> 38 Craig Benedict said yes, staff has already spoken to some residents, and will continue <br /> 39 with community outreach. <br /> 40 Commissioner McKee asked if the number of residents that may be affected by this is <br /> 41 known. <br /> 42 Craig Benedict said there are no houses in the smaller, marginal area, but there are <br /> 43 three houses in the overall expansion area. He said staff will still put out notices to this area. <br /> 44 Commissioner McKee asked if making this change will require the landowners to do <br /> 45 anything unless they want to. <br /> 46 Craig Benedict said no, no one is required to make any changes to the use of a <br /> 47 property. He said if the County proceeds with the variety of approvals after this, meaning other <br /> 48 partners with the water and sewer boundary agreement, there may be the potential for public <br /> 49 water and sewer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.