Orange County NC Website
Mow Does OWASA Estimate Future Demands for Water and <br />Wastewater Service? <br />Future demand projections axe generated from currently available information about <br />plans for major new development activities (such as UNC's main campus and Carolina <br />North), changes in local building trends, recent water consumption data and trends, reuse <br />projections from the University, and assumptions about future water conservation anxong <br />all customer classes. A list of key assumptions and information sources on which <br />OWASA's most current projections axe based is presented in Attachment C. Wastewater <br />demand projections are generated by applying an empirically derived factor of 0.92.3 to <br />corresponding drirllcing water demand projections, reflecting the fact that only a portion <br />of the drinking water used in the community is returned as wastewater, A spreadsheet <br />with detailed calculations and results is available on request.. <br />Long-term demand forecasts extend through 2050, when we assume that build-out will <br />have occurred; i.e., forecasts for 2050 represent OWASA's best guess at "ultimate" <br />capacity needs. We recognize that Carrboro's and Chapel Hill's projections of future <br />population and emplo}anent, as reflected in Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) data, do <br />not extend beyond 2030 or 20.35, and that both towns expect to be substantially built out <br />by then. OWASA's pr~ojectioras of future water mrd wastewater treatment demands <br />therefore con°espwtd to housing and employment levels that exceed Cm°rboro's ar:d <br />Clsapel Hill's buildout projections by more than 20 percent. We believe that tlris <br />provides a conservative margin of safety for meeting the capacity needs of future <br />development. <br />We also recognize that the actual pace and timing of growth in the community and the <br />University may result in short-terns departures from our projected demand trends, but <br />such departures are not expected to affect long-terns estimates of water and sewer system <br />capacity needs. As more detailed o owth plans are developed by Carrboro, Chapel Hill, <br />and UNC, OWASA will continue to revise and refine our pxo,jected demands accordingly.. <br />We expect, for example, that the more or less linear pattern assumed for future b owth (as <br />depicted in Figure 1), will likely bend upward in the middle years before leveling off at <br />or below projected buildout levels, <br />Are There Any Options for Additional Water Supply Sources That <br />Could Reduce Our Vulnerability to Severe Droughts Before the <br />Expanded Stone Quarry Is Available in the 2030s? <br />OWASA's 5 percent allocation of the Jordan Lake water supply storage capacity will <br />yield an average of about 5 mgd. If used by our community, this could substantially <br />reduce our vulnerability to severe droughts until the expanded Quarry Reservoir is <br />available in the 20.30s. However, constructing facilities to obtain and transport water <br />from Jordan Lake to OWASA's water treatment plant in Canboro would cost <br />approximately $45 million in today's (2006) dollars - an expensive investment for a <br />OWASA -Water and Sewer Capacity /mplicatiars of tncrensed Derelopnrent De»sity <br />Page 9 0~ ZI <br />